The birth certificate of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s son, Archie Harris, has not been made public.
While the certificate is required to list the place of birth as Mountbatten in Windsor, Buckingham Palace has chosen not to release it.
This decision stands in stark contrast to the Prince and Princess of Wales, who made the birth certificates of their three children available for historical purposes.
As questions arise about Archie’s exclusion from King Charles’s coronation, more revelations about the Sussex children are coming to light.
Why is Archie’s birth certificate sealed?
Who claims he was born on May 6th?
Numerous secrets are being exposed.
Today, a source has revealed that Prince Harry slipped up, indicating that the baby’s appearance changed over a span of two weeks while Gale King, co-host of CBS’s This Morning, visited the UK for a paid photo-op during the week of April 26th.
Additionally, Meghan Markle, who was supposedly 10 months pregnant on May 6th, returned from the hospital in under four hours.
It appears that Harry and Meghan have been dishonest about many aspects surrounding Archie’s birth.
Gale King is the individual who has obtained insider information about Archie’s existence.
It is worth noting that she was invited to Windsor Castle to film the public debut of Archie, just two days after his birth on May 6th.
While CBS did not receive exclusive access to the big reveal, Gale King did spend time with Meghan and Harry at their new home, Frogmore Cottage, a few days prior to the birth.
Interestingly, Meghan Markle brought Gale King into the palace discreetly.
Notably, Gale King also attended Meghan’s baby shower in New York City, where Archie was not present.
This raises doubts about the existence of an invisible child.
Palace sources have confirmed that Archie did not accompany Meghan and Prince Harry on their trip to the United States.
It is evident that Harry and Meghan are shrouding their children in secrecy.
We still do not know who delivered Archie, as no doctor’s signature appears on the birth certificate displayed at Buckingham Palace.
Furthermore, reports indicate that Archie’s birth certificate is the only royal birth certificate that remains sealed.
Additionally, the record of his baptism is also concealed.
Regardless of what transpired, this situation highlights the need for significant oversight when it comes to anyone in the line of succession.
If individuals wish to exercise their alleged birth rights of princely rank and place in the line of succession, they should not be able to keep their births or other aspects of their lives hidden from the public or avoid scrutiny.
There was some disagreement between the royal family and the Sussexes regarding the titles given to their children, but the lack of transparency surrounding Archie’s birth raises concerns from my perspective, sitting behind my screen.
The protocol and customs for announcing the place of birth and displaying the “moon bump” were not followed.
It seems peculiar for the royal family to grant privileges to non-working royals with such questionable credibility regarding Archie’s birth and lineage.
Markle’s insistence on secrecy and deception has only fueled further speculation.