Prince Harry has found himself in hot water after making sensational allegations about his brother, Prince William, in his controversial memoir “Spare.”
The host of Sky News, Peter Stefanovic, wasted no time in slamming Harry’s book as dull and uninteresting, particularly in light of Meghan’s lucrative $20 million podcast deal.
“Harry’s book is atrocious and just plain boring, and I’m still stuck on the fact that he would throw his own brother under the bus,” Peter remarked.
“But if he’s content with making money, trashing his family, and living with a guilty conscience, then good luck to him.
What a fine gentleman he is.”
However, despite any broken deals, the Sussexes continue to rake in substantial amounts of money.
But how long will their financial success last?
In his memoir, Harry labeled Prince William his arch-nemesis.
The Duke didn’t hold back when expressing his complex emotions towards his older sibling, openly venting his bitter frustrations about being the spare to William, who is destined to be the future king.
Harry also accused William of physically assaulting him and alleged that the palace orchestrated negative media coverage about Meghan.
During an interview with Good Morning America earlier this year, Harry admitted that there had always been a sense of competition between him and his brother, which he attributed to their respective positions in the line of succession.
When asked about referring to his brother as both beloved and an arch-nemesis in the book, Harry responded, “There has always been this competition between us, strangely.
I believe it stems from the heir-spare dynamic.”
Confirming recent reports, it was announced that Meghan’s Spotify podcast, “Archetypes,” will not be renewed for a second season.
In a joint statement, the streaming giant and the Sussexes expressed mutual agreement on parting ways, while also expressing pride in the series they created together.
However, Bill Simmons, the head of podcast innovation and monetization at Spotify, publicly criticized the couple on his own podcast.
“These damn opportunists,” he exclaimed.
“We should have launched that podcast without them.
I need to get drunk one night and share the story of the Zoom meeting I had with Harry to help him with his podcast idea.
It’s one of my best anecdotes.”
Meanwhile, Prince Emmanuel Filiberto of Savoy weighed in on Prince Harry’s tumultuous departure from the royal family, expressing mixed feelings about the situation.
“I don’t like to criticize,” Filiberto stated.
“They made their choice.
Harry is a very intelligent young man.
He faced a lot of media attention from a young age, and after his mother’s death, he perhaps wanted a different life and decided to move to America with his wife.
It saddened me to see him arrive alone at King Charles’ coronation because he is still the son of the King of England.”
However, Filiberto emphasized that private matters should remain within families.
Back in January, during an interview with ITV’s Tom Bradby, Harry explained that one of the reasons he is dedicated to transforming the UK’s media landscape is due to ongoing legal battles.
However, according to a Newsweek poll of 1,500 Americans, nearly half of the respondents claimed that Harry’s media crusade held no significance for them, while 34% admitted to having no knowledge of the case whatsoever.
This data suggests that Harry may need to come to terms with the fact that his campaign, which he deemed his life’s work, might not resonate with the American public.
It’s worth noting that Americans rejected the monarchy in favor of a life centered around true freedom, including the right to free speech—a concept that Harry seems to oppose.
Perhaps it’s time for him to reconsider his strategy.