Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are reportedly seething with anger after being left off the guest list for King Charles’ birthday celebration.
This marks the first time that royal children have been excluded from their father’s trooping the collar event.
The King, who is set to celebrate his birthday parade this Saturday, has chosen not to invite the Sussexes.
Royal expert Richard Eden suggests that this decision reflects the uncertain future of Meghan and Harry within the royal household.
In his column for the Daily Mail, Richard Eden reveals that Prince Harry and Meghan have not received an invitation to the King’s birthday parade.
This is a significant moment for Harry, as he has always been welcomed at the monarch’s official birthday celebrations.
A source shared with Eden, “I’m afraid it’s a reflection of the state of relations at the moment.”
The news of their exclusion has sparked mixed reactions from fans.
One disgruntled supporter commented that King Charles and the royal family should not invite the couple, as they constantly complain and cause drama.
According to this view, Meghan and Harry bring a dark shadow wherever they go, ruining every occasion with their self-centered behavior.
Another fan echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that actions have consequences and that the couple’s repeated disrespect for the royal family should not be tolerated.
Lady Colin Campbell, a prominent figure in royal circles, also welcomed King Charles’ decision, referring to Prince Harry as a viper.
She believes that Charles would have been foolish to invite them, as Harry has proven to be disloyal and indifferent to anything that supports the monarchy.
Furthermore, tensions escalated when King Charles declined financial support for Meghan Markle.
According to Robert Jobson’s book, “Our King,” Charles informed Harry that he could not afford to pay Meghan as a member of the royal family because he was already supporting Camilla and William’s growing family.
This decision reportedly infuriated Harry, leading to a breakdown in communication between father and son.
Charles stopped answering Harry’s calls after his son repeatedly demanded money.
The Queen reportedly questioned Charles about his refusal to give in, to which he responded by saying that he was not a bank.
This financial disagreement further strained their already fragile relationship.
According to Daniela Elsa, the path chosen by King Charles in dealing with the Sussexes is a double-edged sword.
The decision to remove their HRH titles has left Charles with limited leverage when it comes to handling the couple.
Elsa suggests that Charles may have unintentionally liberated Harry from the constraints of royal life, but at the same time, he has lost control over their actions.
In hindsight, the Queen and Charles’ decision to protect the monarchy by stripping Harry and Meghan of their HRH titles has had both positive and negative consequences.
While it may have affected their marketability, it has also freed Harry from the conventions that governed his life for 35 years.
However, this move has left Charles with limited options in managing the couple’s behavior.
In conclusion, Harry and Meghan find themselves excluded from King Charles’ birthday event, signaling a strained relationship within the royal family.
Their absence has sparked mixed reactions from fans, with some supporting the decision and others criticizing the couple’s behavior.
The financial disagreement between Charles and Harry further highlights the rift between father and son.
Ultimately, the path chosen by King Charles in handling the Sussexes has resulted in unintended consequences, leaving him with limited control over their actions.