In a recent turn of events, the Duchess of Cambridge, Catherine, has chosen not to accompany her husband, Prince William, on his trip to Singapore for their Earthshot project.
This decision has raised eyebrows and led to speculation about potential snubs.
However, renowned royal expert Angela Levin believes that such claims are baseless.
Levin argues that Catherine’s absence is not a snub but rather a thoughtful choice made for the sake of their eldest son, Prince George.
As the young prince is set to take an exam for admission to Eton, one of England’s prestigious schools, Catherine wants to be there to support him during this crucial time.
Levin commends the duchess for prioritizing her son’s well-being and ensuring he doesn’t feel stressed or overwhelmed.
Furthermore, Levin highlights the importance of maintaining a sense of normalcy in the lives of royal children.
Drawing from the late Queen Elizabeth’s admission that she neglected her own children, particularly Prince Charles, Levin emphasizes the significance of Catherine’s dedication to her role as a mother.
By investing time in her young children and supporting families facing difficulties, Catherine aims to provide stability and a strong foundation for their future.
While it is widely believed that Prince George’s status as the future King of England guarantees his admission to Eton, Levin acknowledges the potential pressure and anxiety he may experience.
In contrast, she points out the mistake made by Princess Diana when she insisted on sending Prince Harry to Eton, despite his struggles with exams.
This decision had a lasting impact on Harry’s self-esteem, as he found himself consistently at the bottom of the class.
Levin argues that children should attend schools where they feel comfortable and can meet the demands placed upon them.
In comparing Catherine’s commitment to her family with that of her former sister-in-law, Meghan Markle, Levin highlights the stark differences.
While Catherine prioritizes her children’s well-being, Meghan’s actions seem contradictory.
Levin questions the urgency of Meghan’s lateness to the Invictus Games due to making milkshakes for her kids, only to find out that she embarked on a secret vacation in Portugal immediately after the event.
This behavior raises doubts about Meghan’s sincerity and commitment as a parent.
Levin further criticizes Meghan’s approach to engaging with children during her visit to New York in 2021.
Despite selecting a school in Harlem, one of the poorest areas, Meghan imposed restrictions on the children and teachers.
They were required to sign a gag order, promising not to say anything negative about her or her book, “The Bench.”
Levin finds this silencing of young children troubling, as it stifles their freedom of expression and inhibits open dialogue.
In conclusion, Catherine’s decision to stay home with her children reflects her dedication as a mother and her commitment to providing them with a stable and nurturing environment.
While some may view her absence as a snub, Angela Levin dismisses such claims, emphasizing the importance of putting children’s needs first.
In contrast, Meghan’s actions raise questions about her priorities and sincerity towards her own children and her interactions with young people in general.