Prince Harry has made a surprising claim that he was compelled to step down as a senior member of the royal family and leave the UK.

In a legal challenge against the Home Office, the Duke of Sussex contests a decision to downgrade his security and reveals that he and his wife, Meghan Markle, felt forced to leave the country in 2020.

The High Court heard today that Prince Harry believes his children cannot feel at home in the UK if their safety cannot be ensured.

During the hearing, Shahid Fatima KC, representing Prince Harry, emphasized that the Duke did not view his departure as a voluntary choice.

Fatima read a statement from Prince Harry expressing sadness over the necessity to step back from his role and leave the country.

He reiterated that the UK is his home, an integral part of his children’s heritage, and a place where they should feel safe.

Prince Harry, drawing from his life experiences, expressed reluctance to put himself and his wife in harm’s way.

However, critics argue that Prince Harry’s claims are ironic, given his previous disparagement of his family and the UK as a whole.

They question his desire to return after creating a rift through his actions and statements.

Furthermore, the Netflix series featuring Prince Harry on a private jet, describing it as a “freedom flight,” has been cited as evidence of hypocrisy.

This footage, filmed on March 14th, 2020, as the couple traveled from Canada to Los Angeles, contradicts their stated desire for financial independence and distancing from the royal family.

Skeptics argue that Meghan and Harry’s departure was driven by their dissatisfaction with their royal duties and their desire for a more independent lifestyle.

They suggest that Meghan’s behavior in Australia, including alleged mistreatment of staff and conflicts with Kate and Charlotte, led to her being told to leave.

Critics view their actions as a prolonged tantrum resulting from being denied their desired level of involvement.

Regarding Prince Harry’s security, there is debate over the timeline of events.

While he claims to have lost his security before leaving the UK, some argue that the decision was made after they had already left.

The summit held to discuss their departure occurred after the manifesto, indicating that they were indeed forced out of their royal duties.

Security measures are typically based on credible threats, and if additional security was not provided, it suggests that the intelligence agencies deemed it unnecessary.

In conclusion, Prince Harry’s recent claims about being forced to leave the royal family and the UK have sparked controversy and skepticism.

Critics highlight his previous criticisms and actions as undermining his credibility.

The contradictory nature of his statements and the footage from the Netflix series raise questions about his sincerity and motives.

The legal challenge against the Home Office will further delve into the circumstances surrounding their departure and the security downgrade.