In a surprising turn of events, a Hollywood lawyer has come forward with an intriguing backstory involving Meghan Markle and Prince Harry.

The couple had previously claimed to be involved in a near catastrophic car chase by paparazzi after a dinner event in New York City.

However, their account was quickly called into question, even by New York City Mayor Eric Adams who expressed doubts about the incident’s veracity.

Just two days after making their claims, Meghan and Harry demanded that back grid, a celebrity photo business based in California, hand over the pictures taken during the alleged high-speed chase.

Their request was met with arrogance and pompousness, surprising even the Hollywood paparazzi.

However, back grid’s response was far from submissive.

They fired back with a condescending reply, dripping with icy satisfaction.

Joanna Jo Ardelin, a partner at One LLP, a Beverly Hills-based boutique firm specializing in intellectual property and copyright law, revealed that the photos obtained by back grid do not depict anything resembling a near catastrophe or a two-hour chase through Manhattan’s crowded streets.

The lawyer also highlighted that the Sussexes unintentionally drew attention to a much larger issue – the rights of photographers and creators to own their work.

They referenced the ongoing lawsuit between back grid and Andy Warhol as an example.

The lawyer further emphasized the audacity of Meghan and Harry’s demand and their attempt to rewrite the established dynamic between paparazzi and celebrities.

Traditionally, stars receive attention from the press, and in return, the paparazzi can profit from their work.

This case raised uncomfortable questions about the couple’s hypocrisy and their position on this matter.

The lawyer’s response garnered widespread attention and marked a turning point for Meghan and Harry.

Despite more than six months passing since the alleged car chase, there has been no definitive statement from New York City confirming its occurrence.

However, some individuals still believe the couple’s account, which is a testament to their ability to avoid facing consequences for their actions.

This incident has further fueled the dislike towards Harry and Meghan Markle.

Their perceived ability to act without repercussions while leading a seemingly charmed life has irked many.

The lawyer’s scathing response shed light on the couple’s questionable behavior and the consequences of their actions.

In conclusion, Meghan and Harry’s attempt to flex their perceived influence against the press backfired when their demand for photos from back grid was met with a stern response.

This incident not only highlighted the issue of ownership rights for photographers but also raised questions about the couple’s hypocrisy.

As they continue to navigate their public image, it remains to be seen how this incident will impact their reputation in Hollywood and beyond.