In the much-anticipated review of Omid Scobie’s new book, “Endgame,” Piers Morgan doesn’t hold back.
Known for his controversial opinions, Morgan unleashes a scathing critique of Scobie, labeling him a “weasley lickspittle” who peddles lies about the royal family.
While some may question Morgan’s credibility, there’s no denying his expertise when it comes to all things royal.
And when it comes to taking down Scobie, Morgan is unmatched.
Morgan’s full review can be found in The Sun, with the headline reading, “Omid Scobie’s a Weasley Lickspittle Making a Living Peddling Garbage About the Royals.
I Know Endgame is Full of Lies.”
While we won’t delve into the entire article, let’s explore some of the highlights.
One word that stands out in Morgan’s review is “lickspittle.”
According to him, it’s one of his favorite words in the English language.
He traces its origins back to the medieval period, where it was used to describe flatterers who groveled for personal gain.
Morgan then goes on to describe Scobie as a “heavy-eyebrowed little weasel” who constantly spews garbage about the royal family on behalf of Meghan and Harry.
Morgan’s description of Scobie resonates with many who believe that the couple’s victim narrative is far from accurate.
In fact, Morgan argues that Meghan and Harry are among the most privileged individuals in the world.
As for Scobie’s unwavering support for the Sussexes, Morgan questions his bias and loyalty, suggesting that he would defend them even if they committed a heinous crime.
But it’s not just Scobie’s credibility that Morgan questions.
He also highlights the author’s alleged lies about his own interactions with the royal family.
Scobie claims to have had phone conversations with Queen Camilla and implies that she supported Morgan’s controversial remarks about Meghan.
However, Morgan vehemently denies these claims, asserting that he has never spoken to Queen Camilla and that Scobie misinterpreted his statements.
Morgan further discredits Scobie by pointing out the author’s inconsistencies and falsehoods.
He questions the reliability of Scobie’s sources and emphasizes that the claims made in the book are baseless.
According to Morgan, Scobie’s attempts to smear the royal family are particularly disturbing, considering the recent loss of their beloved matriarch, Queen Elizabeth II.
While Morgan acknowledges that there may be some accurate details in the book, he suspects that Scobie obtained them through dubious means.
In particular, he mentions the letters exchanged between Prince Charles and Meghan after the Oprah Winfrey interview, where concerns about the skin color of their unborn child were allegedly discussed.
Morgan finds it hard to believe that any member of the royal family would express racially motivated concerns, especially based on his own reliable sources.
In conclusion, Morgan questions the motives behind Scobie’s book.
He ponders whether the short-term success of the book is worth the long-term damage it will cause.
Furthermore, he doubts that Meghan and Harry will stand by Scobie when faced with the backlash from his deceitful claims.
Loyalty, it seems, is not a quality shared among liars and thieves.
What are your thoughts on Scobie’s book?
Share your opinions in the comment section below.
And if you enjoyed this video, don’t forget to subscribe and share it with others who might find it interesting.
Thank you for watching, and we’ll see you in the next installment of Kate Middleton and the Queen Channel.