In a new book that has caused quite a stir, Meghan Markle is being criticized for blaming Princess Michael of Kent and King Charles for the tensions between the Sussexes and the Royals.

The book, titled “Endgame Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy’s Fight for Survival,” supports Meghan’s claim that a member of the royal family questioned the color of her unborn son Archie’s skin.

Shockingly, according to the book’s author, Omid Scobie, it wasn’t just one royal who raised this issue, but two.

A Dutch journalist, Rick Evers, who has already read the book, revealed that both Charles and Princess Michael of Kent are named as the individuals responsible for the discriminatory conversations.

Evers stated that the book includes an exchange of letters between Charles and Meghan, which were seen by an employee who confirmed their contents.

In these letters, Charles expressed his disappointment in the growing distance between them following Meghan’s interview with Oprah.

He wanted to clarify that there was no ill will or prejudice towards his future grandson.

However, many are questioning Meghan’s accusations against Charles, as he has shown nothing but support and affection towards her.

Charles walked Meghan down the aisle during her wedding, and even after the ceremony, he walked with her mother, Doria.

He recently completed a successful visit to Kenya, where he treated Meghan as if she were his own daughter.

It was Charles who suggested having a gospel choir to honor Meghan’s ancestry and personally selected the choir to use.

So, why would Meghan blame him?

Critics argue that Meghan herself has displayed discriminatory behavior in the past.

They point out that she used to straighten her hair and lighten her skin tone, trying to erase her natural afro traits and appear more “white.”

Additionally, they question Meghan’s claim that employees have access to her personal letters and can leak them.

In reality, if there were any letters exchanged between Charles and Meghan, only they would have known the contents.

The fact that these supposed letters were leaked raises doubt about their existence.

Furthermore, Meghan’s history of strategically leaking information to the media is brought into question.

Just before the coronation, letters she wrote to the King were revealed in the Telegraph, seemingly an intentional move to create tension within the royal family.

It appears that Meghan was targeting Prince William and Catherine, but ultimately, it is the King she seems determined to take down.

Regarding Princess Michael of Kent, Meghan and Scobie manipulated the detail about her allegedly questioning Archie’s skin color.

In truth, Princess Michael of Kent had never even spoken to Meghan before.

The controversy surrounding her stems from wearing a Blackamore brooch to a royal event at Buckingham Palace in 2017, which many saw as exoticizing people of color.

She later apologized, stating that it was unintentional.

It is worth mentioning that Scobie, who co-wrote the book with Meghan, has been accused of being biased and serving as her spokesperson.

He claims that Prince Charles kept him away from royal engagements for months because he believed Scobie was acting as Prince Harry’s emissary.

However, critics argue that Scobie shouldn’t be surprised by this, considering his history of attacking the royal family and doing Meghan’s bidding.

In conclusion, the release of this book has only intensified the ongoing feud between Meghan and the royal family.

While Meghan accuses Charles and Princess Michael of Kent of discrimination, many are skeptical of her claims and question her own behavior.

The controversy surrounding this book and its author further deepens the divide between the Sussexes and the Royals.