Prince Harry is set to receive the prestigious title of a living legend of aviation, but the decision has left many top military veterans outraged and bewildered.

The accolade, which places the Duke of Sussex in the same league as iconic figures like Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong, has been labeled a pathetic publicity stunt by retired senior officers.

They argue that while Harry was applauded for his service as an army helicopter pilot in Afghanistan, it is his royal status that has led to his selection over hundreds of equally deserving pilots.

The induction ceremony for Prince Harry as a living legend of aviation is scheduled to take place next Friday in Beverly Hills, California.

The event, hosted by John Travolta, aims to honor Harry’s contributions as a humanitarian, military veteran, mental wellness advocate, and environmentalist.

The organizers emphasize that he has dedicated his life to advancing causes he is passionate about and that bring about lasting change for people and places.

However, Lord West, former head of the Royal Navy, dismisses the notion that Harry deserves such recognition.

He criticizes the decision, stating, “He’s not a living legend of aviation.

To suggest that he is, is pathetic.

It makes the whole thing seem like nonsense, if they’re willing to pick someone like Prince Harry.

He didn’t carry off any great, exciting feat of amazing flying skill while flying for the army.

They’re just trying to get publicity.

They know that it’ll cause a stir.”

Colonel Richard Kemp, a retired military officer, shares a similar sentiment, describing the award as nothing more than celebrities massaging each other’s egos.

He argues that while Harry served as a gunner in an Apache helicopter in Afghanistan, many others also performed extraordinary acts of bravery in the British and American armed forces.

Colonel Kemp believes the award is motivated solely by Harry’s celebrity status and does not recognize true greatness.

The comparison between Harry and iconic figures like Neil Armstrong has been met with ridicule.

Critics argue that Harry’s achievements pale in comparison to those who have truly made significant contributions in the field of aviation.

An RAF source expressed their skepticism, stating that it was “a little bit odd” for Harry to receive such an award.

In fact, a poll conducted by Express.co.uk revealed that nearly 93% of respondents believe Harry is undeserving of the aviation honor.

The controversy surrounding the award has sparked widespread debate, with many questioning Harry’s credentials and the motives behind the decision.

Some argue that his relatively limited flying experience, having flown for only 20 weeks in Afghanistan, does not warrant the title of a living legend of aviation.

Speculation even suggests that Meghan may have purchased the award for Harry, further fueling the skepticism.

Royal expert Angela Levin remains uncertain about Harry’s eligibility for the award.

She highlights the brevity of his flying hours and questions whether his contributions truly justify the recognition.

Levin suggests that Harry may have exaggerated his pilot status to Meghan, leading to this controversial honor.

As the debate rages on, it is evident that Prince Harry’s Living Legend of Aviation Award has generated significant controversy and divided opinions.

While some argue that he deserves the recognition for his service and dedication to important causes, others insist that his royal status has overshadowed more deserving candidates.

The discussion surrounding this award serves as a reminder that accolades should be based on merit rather than celebrity status.