Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, is set to receive the Living Legends in Aviation award, but the decision has been met with widespread criticism and disbelief.

The award, which recognizes significant contributions to aviation and aerospace, is being seen by many as undeserved and merely a publicity stunt.

The controversy stems from the fact that Prince Harry was never actually a pilot, despite his claims.

He served as a co-pilot and gunner in an Apache helicopter during his two tours of Afghanistan, but he was never the one in control of the aircraft.

This revelation has led to questions about his eligibility for such a prestigious honor.

Critics argue that the award should be reserved for individuals who have made extraordinary achievements in the field of aviation, such as Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong, who are also being honored at the ceremony.

Prince Harry’s role as a co-pilot and gunner does not meet the criteria for a significant contribution to the industry.

The event, organized by the nonprofit Kitty Hawk Air Academy, aims to honor those who have made notable contributions to aviation and aerospace.

However, the inclusion of Prince Harry in this lineup has raised eyebrows and fueled accusations of favoritism based on his celebrity status.

Retired military officer Colonel Richard Kemp expressed his disappointment, stating that the award is simply a way for celebrities to massage each other’s egos.

He argued that there are numerous individuals who have performed extraordinary acts of bravery and deserve recognition far more than Prince Harry.

The skepticism surrounding the award has also led to speculation about the motives behind it.

Some have questioned whether there is a connection to Scientology, as the event is being hosted by actor John Travolta, a well-known Scientologist.

The presence of Tom Cruise, another prominent Scientologist, among the honorees has further fueled these rumors.

While Prince Harry’s involvement with Scientology is purely speculative, it is clear that his reputation has taken a hit due to this controversy.

Many believe that the award is undeserved and undermines the achievements of those who have genuinely made significant contributions to aviation.

As public opinion continues to mount against Prince Harry’s honor, it remains to be seen how the event will unfold.

The backlash serves as a reminder that awards should be based on merit rather than celebrity status, and that true recognition should be reserved for those who have truly earned it.

In conclusion, the decision to honor Prince Harry with the Living Legends in Aviation award has sparked controversy and criticism.

Many argue that his role as a co-pilot and gunner does not meet the criteria for such a prestigious honor.

The inclusion of celebrities and rumors of a Scientology connection have further fueled skepticism.

As public sentiment turns against Prince Harry’s award, it raises questions about the integrity of such ceremonies and the importance of recognizing genuine achievements in the field of aviation.