Amidst the ongoing health issues faced by King Charles and Princess Catherine, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s recent public appearance in Jamaica has drawn significant criticism.

The couple attended the premiere of the Bob Marley movie and were photographed with the Republican Jamaican Prime Minister and his wife, among others.

Sarah Vine from the Daily Mail highlights the couple’s silence regarding the health of King Charles and questions their priorities.

Despite reports of Harry’s desire for reconciliation with his father, his actions seem contradictory.

Vine argues that it is particularly inappropriate for Harry and Meghan to engage in such public events while their family members are in the hospital.

She questions their claims of being caring philanthropists and humanitarians, as they missed an opportunity to raise awareness about prostate health and neglected to wish Princess Catherine a speedy recovery.

This raises concerns about their sincerity and commitment to their supposed values.

Furthermore, Vine points out the significance of Harry and Meghan’s choice to associate themselves with the anti-monarchist Jamaican Prime Minister.

By doing so, they appear to be undermining the reputation of the royal family and the institution as a whole.

Their actions reflect a deliberate attempt to fuel anti-royalist sentiment, both within the Commonwealth and beyond.

It is evident that Harry and Meghan’s actions are not as innocent as they may seem.

They are tapping into the divisive culture wars that dominate public discourse and positioning themselves as refugees from a regressive regime.

Their behavior suggests a clear intention to distance themselves from the monarchy and contribute to the growing anti-royalist sentiment.

Sarah Vine proposes a solution for King Charles: stripping Harry and Meghan of their royal titles.

This would align with their apparent disdain for the monarchy and allow them to be truly free from their royal obligations.

It is time to cut ties with individuals who hold such contempt for the institution they represent.

Moving on to viewer comments, it is clear that many share the belief that Meghan Markle was never suited for the role of a working royal.

She seemed more focused on her personal ambitions and self-promotion than fulfilling her duties.

Queen Elizabeth’s keen perception allowed her to see through Meghan’s facade and recognize the potential trouble she could bring.

Commenter Kate Linden emphasizes that Meghan’s marriage to Harry was a means to gain fame and return to Hollywood, rather than a commitment to royal duties and humanitarian work.

From the outset, Meghan prioritized her own interests over those of the royal family and the Commonwealth.

Her actions were calculated to mirror Princess Diana and manipulate Harry into marriage.

Another viewer, Margaret Fraser, humorously suggests that anyone else would be better suited to step in for the king and princess in their time of need.

The idea of Harry and Meghan filling this role seems far-fetched and unrealistic.

In conclusion, the recent public appearance of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle has sparked controversy and criticism.

Their actions during a time of family health concerns have raised questions about their priorities and commitment to their supposed values.

The couple’s association with anti-monarchist figures further fuels speculation about their intentions.

Stripping them of their royal titles may be a fitting response to their apparent disdain for the monarchy.

As always, we look forward to hearing your thoughts on this matter.

Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more updates from Kate Middleton and the Queen.