Meghan Markle, known for her unique sense of style, yet again raised eyebrows with her fashion choices during the second day of engagements in Whistler for the Invictus Games one year to go celebration.
Accompanied by her husband Prince Harry, Meghan sported a black Hermes puffer jacket, paired with black LeLand skinny jeans, a dark blue scarf, a Canadian Artesia beanie, and Kameik boots as she interacted with competitors and sports coaches.
Despite the hefty price tag of around $5,000 for the Hermes puffer, Meghan’s ability to make luxury brands appear cheap has not gone unnoticed, with some prestigious fashion houses distancing themselves from her.
In a surprising turn of events, renowned fashion labels such as Chanel, Givenchy, and Hermes have chosen to sever ties with Meghan Markle.
Reports suggest that these luxury brands have made a deliberate decision to disassociate themselves from any collaboration with the former actress.
While Meghan has ventured into affiliate marketing endeavors to generate income, her attempts to align with top-tier brands like Dior, Hermes, and Cartier have been met with rejection.
Meghan’s reluctance to showcase Invictus Games merchandise has sparked criticism, seen as a display of disrespect towards the event.
Her preference for high-end designer outfits over supporting the cause through branded clothing has not gone unnoticed.
The exorbitant prices of her wardrobe, including the nearly £8,000 worth of clothing worn during a 12-hour trip to Canada, have drawn attention to the stark contrast between her lavish lifestyle and the financial struggles faced by many, including Canadian disabled veterans.
The Sussexes’ recent Valentine’s Day getaway to Vancouver came under fire for their choice to take a private flight, a move criticized as eco-hypocritical by royal analysts.
The couple’s penchant for luxury living at the expense of others has garnered scrutiny, particularly their frequent use of private jets funded by external sources.
While the Invictus Foundation covered expenses such as private jet and helicopter transportation, as well as luxurious accommodations, questions have arisen about the ethics of such expenditures when intended to support wounded veterans.
Critics have pointed out the disparity between the Sussexes’ lavish travel habits and the more modest approach taken by other senior British Royals, who often opt for commercial flights.
Reports indicate that Harry and Meghan have taken multiple private jet trips in a short span of time, raising concerns about their reliance on external funding for extravagant lifestyle choices.
The couple’s preference for solo flights funded by third parties has fueled speculation about their financial priorities and values.
As the controversy surrounding Meghan Markle’s fashion statements and lifestyle choices continues to unfold, the focus remains on the implications of her actions on various fronts.
From her sartorial decisions to her travel preferences, each aspect of Meghan’s public persona is under scrutiny, highlighting the complexities of navigating fame, wealth, and social responsibility in the public eye.