In a surprising turn of events, luxury brand Cartier has firmly turned down Meghan Markle as their brand ambassador, despite her aspirations.
Following the setback of the Spotify deal, Markle, who considers herself a savvy entrepreneur, is now setting her sights on launching her own business, drawing inspiration from Gwyneth Paltrow’s successful venture, Goop.
Sources close to her reveal that she harbors a desire to represent a prestigious luxury brand like Cartier.
Currently maintaining a low profile, Meghan’s associates note that this silence often precedes a major announcement from her.
She is actively pursuing a long-term partnership with a renowned jewelry company, with Cartier being her top choice.
Despite publicly gifting her daughter, Princess Lilibet, a Cartier bracelet and watch, the brand remains unmoved by her overtures.
Cartier, renowned for its iconic status in the jewelry industry, was established by Louis-Francois Cartier in 1847 with a vision to revolutionize jewelry design through innovation.
Meghan Markle, known for showcasing Cartier’s opulent pieces, may find the brand’s commitment to originality a barrier to her ambassadorship aspirations.
Speculations arise that Meghan may be grooming her daughter to potentially fulfill this ambition in the future.
Meanwhile, Bollywood actress Deepika Padukone has been unveiled as Cartier’s latest brand ambassador, joining an elite roster of A-list personalities.
Recognized twice by Time magazine as one of the world’s most influential individuals, Deepika recently flaunted a striking Descartier Panther and Zebra necklace at a prestigious gala in Paris.
The necklace, adorned with precious gemstones, symbolizes Cartier’s ethos of innovation and inclusivity.
Amidst these developments, the Sussex family is reportedly facing financial challenges, exacerbated by repeated brand rejections.
Despite declining opportunities, such as speaking engagements, the Sussexes’ decision-making has come under scrutiny.
Notably, royal historian Hugo Vickers criticizes Prince Harry’s deviation from his Invictus Games legacy, suggesting a shift towards victimhood rather than empowerment.
As the Sussexes navigate their future in America, Vickers underscores the need for reinvention to sustain public interest.
Drawing parallels to Madonna’s transformative career, he warns that the couple must either innovate dramatically or risk fading into obscurity.
The pressure mounts for Meghan and Harry to redefine their narrative and captivate audiences anew, lest they lose relevance in the ever-evolving landscape of fame and influence.