Meghan Markle made headlines when she paid a visit to the Los Angeles Children’s Hospital, drawing both admiration and criticism.

The Duchess of Sussex’s appearance at the hospital on March 21st bore a striking resemblance to moments from Princess Diana’s charitable endeavors.

Markle engaged with patients and staff members as part of the hospital’s Make March Matter campaign, which aims to garner support for children’s health initiatives.

During her visit, Markle participated in the Literally Healing program, where she read books like Rosie Revere, Engineer, Pete the Cat and His Four Groovy Buttons, and The All-Saw-A-Cat to families at the hospital.

This reading initiative contributes over 65,000 books annually to the Children’s Hospital, fostering a love for reading among young patients.

Additionally, Markle engaged in STEAM activities with the children, including coloring, problem-solving, and number counting exercises.

The parallels between Meghan Markle’s visit and Princess Diana’s legacy were not lost on observers.

Princess Diana was known for her heartfelt interactions with those in need, such as her visit to the Paediatric Aids Unit at Harlem Hospital in 1989.

Gwen Elliott McIntosh, an administrator at Harlem Hospital, recalled Diana’s genuine compassion towards the children, highlighting the impact of her actions during a time of misinformation and fear surrounding AIDS.

However, not everyone viewed Markle’s hospital visit in a positive light.

Actor and director Keanu Reeves criticized Markle for allegedly using the visit as a publicity stunt, questioning the timing of her charitable activities following her move to America and a recent brand launch.

Reeves contrasted Markle’s approach with his own philanthropic efforts, emphasizing altruism over self-promotion.

Critics pointed out Markle’s decision to bring a film crew along to document her hospital visit, raising concerns about the exploitation of the children for promotional purposes.

The Duchess was accused of prioritizing her image and personal gain over the well-being of the young patients.

The use of Polaroid pictures and personalized gifts for the children, while appreciated by some, was seen by others as a calculated attempt to enhance her public persona.

The controversy surrounding Meghan Markle’s hospital visit reignited debates about celebrity philanthropy and the ethics of using charity for self-promotion.

Questions were raised about the motives behind Markle’s actions and the extent of her commitment to charitable causes.

Despite the positive impact of her engagement with the children, criticisms regarding her methods and intentions persisted.

In conclusion, Meghan Markle’s hospital visit, inspired by Princess Diana’s humanitarian legacy, sparked a mix of admiration and skepticism.

While some praised her efforts to support children’s health initiatives, others questioned the authenticity of her motives and the potential exploitation of the hospital visit for personal gain.

The debate surrounding celebrity charity work and the responsibilities that come with public visibility continues to provoke discussion and reflection.