In a recent turn of events in the ongoing royal saga, Lady C has stirred the pot by leveling accusations of perjury against Prince Harry.
The controversy stems from a purported NYPD letter brandished by Harry and Meghan in a British court, claiming a perilous paparazzi pursuit in New York.
However, insiders and the public have debunked this letter as nothing more than a fabrication, likening its credibility to that of the Tooth Fairy.
The crux of the matter lies in the contents of the letter presented by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to the UK High Court, alleging imminent arrests in connection to the paparazzi incident.
Yet, sources close to the situation revealed to The Post that there is a glaring absence of concrete evidence to support any such claims.
Ironically, the British court cited this very letter from the NYPD as grounds to deny Harry the taxpayer-funded security he adamantly sought.
Amidst the unfolding drama, sources within the NYPD expressed exasperation at the handling of the situation by Harry and Meghan’s security team.
Despite the investigation concluding that the paparazzi’s actions were reckless, the failure of the royal couple’s security detail to adhere to a coordinated plan exacerbated the chaos.
Harry’s insistence on someone facing repercussions lacked the crucial element of evidence, a fact underscored by the NYPD’s assertion of insufficient proof.
Further complicating matters is the revelation that the contentious letter formed part of Harry’s legal battle against the British government for security provisions post-royal exit.
The stark contrast between the letter’s emotive language condemning the paparazzi’s conduct and a subsequent missive from Harry’s lawyer hinting at impending arrests paints a perplexing picture.
The High Court’s rejection of Harry’s security plea dealt a blow to the narrative of victimhood the couple sought to cultivate.
Lady C did not mince words in her critique, suggesting that if Harry indeed introduced a forged NYPD letter in court, it transcends mere deception to criminality.
Casting doubt on the likelihood of repercussions due to Harry’s perceived immunity, she hinted at the need for private prosecution to uphold justice.
The overwhelming consensus in the Court of Public Opinion, with a resounding 99% denouncing Harry and Meghan’s actions, underscores the gravity of the situation.
As the scandal continues to unfold, the public is left questioning the depths to which Harry and Meghan will plunge in pursuit of the limelight.
From their royal renunciation to the courtroom theatrics, the couple’s narrative oscillates between entertainment and exasperation, leaving observers intrigued by the next twist in this ongoing saga.