There has been a whirlwind of unusual conspiracies surrounding the christening portrait of Archie, the son of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
Social media users have taken to platforms like Quora to voice their doubts about the authenticity of the picture.
One theory suggests that the photo of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip meeting Archie was photoshopped.
According to user Sue Kelly, the image is fake, as the Queen was seen wearing the same outfit at the Royal Windsor Horse Show.
Kelly believes that the photo was manipulated and that the Queen’s interaction with Archie was superimposed onto another picture.
She argues that if the Queen had attended a shore viewing, she would have worn something more significant.
However, not everyone agrees with these wild conspiracy theories.
Some argue that the Queen herself used that very photo in the video highlights during her Christmas speech that year.
It seems unlikely that she or the palace would use a photoshopped image that creates a false narrative.
Diana Eppers, another user on Quora, raises questions about the secrecy surrounding Harry and Meghan’s children.
She wonders why Meghan limited the number of cameras and press when introducing Archie to the world.
Eppers suggests that if everything was straightforward, they would have invited every news outlet.
Additionally, she points out that during the presentation of Archie, the cameras were not given a clear view of the baby, who did not move or make any sounds.
Eppers also mentions the speculation about Harry’s thumb appearing white, suggesting he may have been exerting pressure on the baby’s body to make it appear alive.
Another point of contention is the date of Archie’s christening.
According to some online theorists, there was no christening on the date that was posted.
The Archbishop of Canterbury, who typically performs royal christenings, was reportedly attending a synod meeting far away on that day.
This absence raises doubts about the authenticity of the event.
Furthermore, there are claims that the photo itself has been heavily photoshopped.
Observant individuals can apparently spot where Meghan made mistakes in editing the image.
The absence of any public statements from the Archbishop or other members of the royal family who were supposedly present in the photo adds to the mystery surrounding Archie’s christening.
The lack of transparency surrounding Archie and his sister Lilibet has led to numerous unanswered questions.
Some suggest that Oprah Winfrey could potentially shed light on the situation if she were to host a show specifically addressing these concerns.
Many wonder why there is so much secrecy and a lack of evidence to prove that Meghan gave birth to the children and that they are not surrogates.
The Sussex children remain in the line of succession, yet their origins are shrouded in mystery.
In addition to these suspicions, some social media detectives claim that Archie’s photo underwent extensive post-editing.
According to their analysis, Meghan’s ring appears larger in the picture than it does in real life.
They also point out various anomalies, such as missing chair legs for Catherine, alterations to Camilla’s dress, Doria’s cropped face, and Catherine’s flat and mannequin-like appearance.
Furthermore, some observers argue that Prince William’s head appears misshapen and that he seems unusually tall compared to Father Charles.
Others focus on the thickness and volume of William’s hair, while some claim that his expression reflects strain and disdain.
These minute details have sparked further speculation and debate among online commentators.
Adding to the confusion, there were discrepancies in Catherine and William’s outfits in the official photos.
While it is common for individuals to change clothes or have multiple outfits for official portraits, this raised eyebrows and fueled rumors of royal shenanigans.