A recent social media post by Jonathan Perkins, the Director of Race and Equity at the University of California Los Angeles, has stirred up a storm of controversy regarding the health status of Princess Catherine.

Perkins expressed skepticism about Princess Catherine’s cancer diagnosis, questioning its authenticity and even suggesting that the Princess of Wales may not be alive.

These provocative remarks come in the wake of Princess Catherine’s revelation that she was undergoing preventive chemotherapy for an undisclosed illness, a disclosure that shocked many around the world.

In his tweet, Perkins boldly stated his disbelief in Princess Catherine’s cancer diagnosis, asserting, “I personally don’t believe Kate has or had cancer.”

He went on to insinuate that the royal family strategically used the mention of cancer and chemotherapy to divert attention from questions about Princess Catherine’s absence, successfully quelling any doubts for the most part.

Furthermore, Perkins raised suspicions about the Princess’s well-being, speculating whether she might be in a coma or deceased, and went as far as to declare that both King Chuck and Kate do not merit his respect.

A former admirer of Meghan Markle, whom he once hailed as an American Princess, Perkins has been actively engaged in spreading what he terms as baseless accusations against Princess Catherine on various online platforms.

His previous affiliation with Harvard University and current role at UCLA have not shielded him from criticism for disseminating misinformation and engaging in cyberbullying.

Notably, the Archwell Foundation’s financial records revealed a substantial donation from Meghan and Harry to UCLA, leading some to question the motives behind the contribution.

By linking the donation to a purported campaign targeting Princess Catherine, Perkins implied a nefarious agenda orchestrated by Meghan Markle to undermine the royal family.

He alleged that discrimination and cyberbullying served as convenient pretexts for funding such malicious endeavors.

The substantial monetary support received by UCLA from Archwell, coupled with Perkins’s inflammatory rhetoric, has fueled speculation about ulterior motives behind their actions.

Perkins’s relentless attacks on Princess Catherine have escalated in intensity, with him branding her as a habitual liar and casting doubt on the veracity of her medical condition.

Disparaging comments about her character, insinuations of her possible demise, and accusations of the royal family exploiting her health situation for ulterior motives have all featured prominently in his online tirades.

His callous remarks on Easter Sunday further underscored the callousness of his behavior, drawing sharp criticism for his lack of empathy and decency.

Despite positioning himself as a cancer survivor, Perkins’s conduct has been widely condemned as lacking in empathy and ethical standards.

His unabashed vilification of Princess Catherine stands in stark contrast to his apparent reluctance to subject Meghan Markle to similar scrutiny, raising questions about his impartiality and integrity.

The glaring double standard in his treatment of the two women has not gone unnoticed, prompting calls for accountability and introspection within academic circles.

The broader implications of Perkins’s actions extend beyond mere personal attacks, touching upon broader issues of online bullying and misinformation campaigns.

His affiliations with institutions like UCLA and his perceived alignment with the narratives propagated by Harry and Meghan have sparked concerns about the ethical standards upheld within academic and celebrity circles.