Meghan Markle, the former actress turned Duchess of Sussex, has found herself at the center of controversy once again.
Rumors have been swirling that Markle played a role in the firing of black journalist Alison P Davies after her interview with The Cut did not go as planned.
The interview touched on various topics, including Markle’s complaints about royal work and her desire to return to Instagram.
However, it seems that the article did not present Markle in the best light, leading to backlash.
Critics argue that it is unfair to blame Davies for simply reporting on what she observed during her time with Markle.
It is worth noting that Davies is a black woman, which adds an ironic twist to the situation given Markle’s emphasis on racial identity.
Despite reportedly handpicking Davies for the feature, Markle has been accused of throwing her under the bus when it no longer benefited her.
According to sources from Expose in SMG, Davies is currently on leave without pay, which is disheartening considering the unprofessional treatment she allegedly received from Markle.
Reports suggest that Markle made Davies wait outside for an hour before allowing her into a Montessit show, showcasing a lack of respect for her colleagues.
While the controversy surrounding Markle and Davies unfolds, the South African people have ceased their celebrations, and local publication You magazine has taken up the discussion.
One Twitter user expressed skepticism about Markle’s claim to represent black women, stating that the only thing black about her is her mother and soul, while accusing her of lies, race baiting, and manipulation.
This sentiment reflects a growing sentiment among some internet users who question Markle’s authenticity and ability to truly represent black women.
The scrutiny intensified when Markle revealed on the Archetypes podcast that she is partly Nigerian, leading to varied reactions from internet users.
Some found it amusing, while others questioned the remaining 57% of her heritage and whether she had taken a DNA test.
Markle’s statements have sparked conversations about identity and the complexities of racial representation.
In the midst of these controversies, Markle and Prince Harry have updated the homepage for their non-profit organization, Archwell.
The page now features a photo of the couple taken by their photographer friend, Misan Hariman, along with a quote signed by the couple that emphasizes the power of individual and collective action to bring about change.
Royal expert Angela Levin suggests that this update indirectly conveys the couple’s independence from the royal family since their move to California.
Levin interprets the quote as a statement that Markle and Prince Harry can thrive without the support of the royal family.
However, she argues that this claim is unsubstantiated, as they have not fully relinquished their titles or achieved complete independence.
Levin believes that the couple’s desire to build a new community and change the world is admirable but underscores their continued reliance on their royal connections.
As the controversy surrounding Markle and Davies unfolds, the public remains divided in their opinions.
The allegations against Markle raise questions about her treatment of colleagues and her ability to represent black women authentically.
Meanwhile, Markle and Prince Harry’s updates to their non-profit organization’s website signal their aspirations for independence and global impact, but critics argue that they have yet to fully detach themselves from their royal ties.
Only time will tell how these ongoing narratives will shape Markle’s public image and her relationship with the royal family.