New evidence has surfaced, alleging that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are keeping a significant portion of donations intended for the Invictus Games in Nigeria.
The couple’s recent visit to Nigeria, characterized as a quasi-royal tour, has ignited debates about their evolving roles and status.
Christopher Musa, Nigeria’s top military official, extended an invitation to Meghan and Harry, leading to their three-day stay in the country.
During a conversation with host Nana Akua Cohen, Cohen shed light on a critical yet often misconstrued aspect, particularly among American supporters.
Cohen contended that Harry and Meghan have transitioned from being seen as royals to being perceived as celebrities.
He shared his insights on the couple’s recent rebranding endeavors and criticized Meghan’s involvement in promoting jam through her new venture, American Riviera Orchard.
On GBN America, Cohen remarked, “They’re reaching for any semblance of lost status that they willingly relinquished in 2020.
Now, they’ve seized the chance to embark on a quasi-royal tour, not as representatives of any nation but as champions of their own narrative.”
According to information disclosed by Meghan’s Microphone X, citing Lanny from Barbados Information, there are allegations that the couple is leveraging their 501 charity status to receive donations for Artool from foreign aid in the countries they visit.
It is purported that they retain a substantial 95% of these funds due to their ties with Artool in Delaware.
This development raises concerns about their visits to other nations like Jamaica and Canada and whether they aim to secure additional foreign aid contributions.
Speculation suggests that only a mere 5% of the received funds are spent in the donor country.
The legislation permitting charities to be headquartered in Delaware, championed by Joe Biden during his tenure as a senator, has come under fire.
Critics argue that this law enables charitable organizations to sidestep their fair share of taxes, paralleling the criticisms directed at corporations for tax avoidance.
If the intelligence services can substantiate these claims and present them to King Charles III, it could prompt him to take remedial actions such as suspending or revoking titles, or issuing public statements to discourage such practices.
King Charles III has been briefed on multiple breaches and activities that violate the Sandringham Summit agreement between Prince Harry, Meghan, and the late Queen.
Doubts loom over the sustainability of the couple’s chosen lifestyle, with Harry expressing dissatisfaction with tours and Meghan discontinuing after just two engagements.
Questions arise regarding the willingness of countries to host them under their specified terms.
While security and logistical arrangements may be facilitated, organizing extensive itineraries for individuals lacking official affiliations raises eyebrows.
The future trajectory of Meghan and Harry amidst these challenges remains uncertain.
Critics argue that their reliance on calling in favors, exemplified by seeking assistance from the California governor for a $200 overdue payment, hints at a diminishing network of support.