In a shocking turn of events, allegations of charity fraud have surfaced against Megan Markle and Prince Harry, raising questions about their philanthropic endeavors.
While Megan had previously portrayed herself as a dedicated charity worker, evidence suggests that her involvement in charitable activities only began in 2015.
Furthermore, it has been rumored that the couple misappropriated charity funds, leading to their expulsion from the royal foundation.
Speculation surrounding the alleged theft of charity funds gained traction when an Instagram user named MarkleNews1 discovered a tweet from a person called Luca.
According to Luca, an insider at Kensington Palace revealed that Harry and Megan were caught stealing charity funds, resulting in their expulsion from the UK.
This revelation has left many surprised, as the Sussexes were once seen as advocates for the less fortunate.
Adding fuel to the fire, an anonymous blind item on Crazy Days and Nights claimed that Megan Markle has been involved in a deceptive scheme.
She allegedly identifies thriving but lesser-known charities and promotes them through her own foundation.
By doing so, she not only takes a percentage of the donations for processing but also manipulates the perception of her own generosity by appearing as the largest donor to these organizations.
Recently, the couple’s association with a controversial charity has also come under scrutiny.
Megan and Harry lent their support to Mermaids, an organization that assists transgender children and their families.
However, Mermaids has faced accusations of providing breast bandages to underage girls, sparking outrage and raising questions about the couple’s due diligence in selecting the causes they endorse.
In addition to the charity controversies, the positions of Prince Harry and Prince Andrew as councillors of state have become subjects of debate.
Following their decision to step down as senior royals and relinquish their royal duties, concerns have arisen regarding their future roles in the council.
Viscount Stansgate has raised the question of amending the Regency Act of 1937, which outlines the appointment of councillors of state, to ensure that only working royals who are actively involved in the affairs of the monarchy hold these positions.
Royal commentator Angela Levin echoes this sentiment, emphasizing the importance of having councillors who are closely connected to the royal family and well-informed about ongoing matters.
Levin argues that individuals residing far away or no longer fulfilling their royal duties cannot effectively stand in for a member of the monarchy.
Adding to the intrigue, royal author Tina Brown suggests that Prince Harry poses a greater threat to King Charles’ reign than his brother, Prince Andrew.
Brown points out that Prince Harry’s unpredictable actions keep the royal family on edge, leaving them uncertain about his future plans.
This uncertainty was highlighted during Prince Philip’s memorial service last year when Prince Andrew, despite his controversies, played a more prominent role than Princess Beatrice and Eugenie’s father.
As the public contemplates the future of the monarchy following Queen Elizabeth’s passing and King Charles’ ascension, these controversies and uncertainties surrounding Megan Markle, Prince Harry, and Prince Andrew continue to captivate the attention of the world.
The royal family must navigate these challenges and address the allegations to maintain stability and regain public trust.