The recent approval of the Duke of Sussex’s U.S. visa has stirred up a wave of disgust among the American public, following a series of controversies surrounding his application process.
After a tumultuous exit from the royal family, the Duke of Sussex has officially declared his residency in the United States, cutting ties with the UK, as revealed in a recently disclosed document.
Amidst the uproar, the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, has taken legal action against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) over the issuance of the Duke of Sussex’s visa.
Speculation arose after revelations in his memoir, “Spare,” suggested possible discrepancies in his application related to drug use, raising concerns about the transparency of the process.
While calls intensify for the release of the Duke of Sussex’s visa records by the Heritage Foundation, the DHS is standing firm, citing privacy concerns as grounds for withholding the information.
Peggy Grand, a former executive assistant to President Ronald Reagan, voiced the sentiments of many Americans, expressing dismay over the situation in an interview with Daily Express US.
Drawing attention to the issue, former President Donald Trump highlighted the perceived existence of a dual immigration system favoring different political affiliations.
Allegations of preferential treatment towards high-profile figures close to the Duchess of Sussex, including Hollywood personalities and elites, have fueled public outrage and skepticism towards the fairness of the immigration process.
Critics argue that the government’s handling of the situation reflects a bias towards privileged individuals, with the average American being denied similar considerations.
This disparity has sparked widespread discontent and condemnation, as ordinary citizens question the integrity and equity of the system.
Notable royal commentator and author Tom Quinn weighed in on the controversy, suggesting that the Duke of Sussex may come to regret his past actions and decisions.
Quinn warned of potential repercussions as legal proceedings loom, cautioning that the Duke’s admitted drug use could pose significant challenges in the future, highlighting a recurring pattern of misjudgments when royals act independently.