Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, has never shied away from the limelight.

Whether it be in Nigeria, Australia, or any other platform where a microphone is present, she seizes the opportunity to share her thoughts.

While her intentions may be noble, her delivery often raises eyebrows.

Rather than focusing on the Invictus Games during her time in Nigeria, Meghan delved into topics ranging from mental health to Nigerian identity.

However, today, we delve deeper into not what she said, but how she said it, particularly noting her seemingly angry gestures.

Undoubtedly, Meghan possesses the gift of public speaking.

Her words are clear, concise, and eloquent, ticking all the boxes on paper.

Yet, something seems to be amiss.

Despite her articulate nature, her speeches lack sincerity and depth, leading to what can be described as a “word salad” problem – intelligent-sounding but ultimately incoherent.

This may stem from her tendency to recycle jargon, phrases, and anecdotes, creating a disconnected narrative.

One cannot deny Meghan’s confidence, a trait that radiates through her every word and gesture.

However, at times, this confidence transforms her gesticulations into something overly forceful and severe, bordering on aggression.

Coupled with occasional slips in her facade, revealing glimpses of unfiltered emotion, Meghan’s delivery can sometimes appear more confrontational than regal, leaving a bitter taste for many observers.

The oscillation between apparent happiness and underlying anger in Meghan’s demeanor, evident even without sound, adds to the perplexity surrounding her speeches.

Whether attributed to subconscious tension, alleged medication side effects, or simply a flawed delivery style, the impact remains off-putting.

Despite some admirers praising her eloquence, others criticize her tendency for verbose yet substance-lacking monologues, labeling it as “verbal diarrhea.”

Critics point out Meghan’s struggle to convey a concise message, often overshadowed by grandiose vocabulary and lacking practical underpinnings.

While her confident presentation may captivate listeners initially, a closer examination reveals a disparity between style and substance.

The inability to self-critique further hampers her growth, as she seemingly basks in self-praise without room for improvement.

In the realm of public scrutiny, Meghan’s speeches have sparked a mix of admiration, frustration, and skepticism.

While some commend her perceived brilliance, others urge for introspection and humility in her communication style.

As opinions continue to diverge, one thing remains clear – Meghan’s delivery, though polished, lacks the depth and authenticity necessary to resonate with a broader audience.