The feminist community was left in shock as reports surfaced claiming that Gloria Steinem, a revered figure in the realm of feminism, had severed ties with Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, following an alleged rift.
Steinem, known for her unwavering advocacy for women’s rights and empowerment, has been a pivotal force in the feminist movement throughout her illustrious career.
A seemingly insignificant bracelet appears to have been the catalyst for the rift between Steinem and Markle.
Crafted by Steinem herself and gifted to Markle as a symbol of their shared mission, the bracelet allegedly met an unfortunate fate when Markle callously discarded it into a trash bin.
At the age of late 80s, Steinem is said to be deeply wounded and disheartened by what she perceives as a betrayal.
In response to the reported incident, Steinem has scrubbed all references to Meghan from feminist.com and her social media platforms, signaling a significant rupture in the once warm relationship between these two influential women.
To grasp the depth of Steinem’s anger and unravel the reasons behind this dramatic fallout, a closer examination of the backstory surrounding Meghan and Gloria’s connection within the context of the bracelet is necessary.
The Linked Not Ranked bracelet held profound significance as a tangible representation of Steinem’s steadfast commitment to feminism.
Beyond its aesthetic value, the accessory boldly conveyed the message that solidarity among women should outweigh competition, as reflected in the empowering phrase it bore.
By bestowing this bracelet upon Meghan, Steinem sought to pass on the torch of feminist leadership to a new generation.
Allegations suggest that Meghan’s actions post-receiving the bracelet have left Steinem feeling betrayed and disillusioned.
Purported video evidence purportedly captures Meghan thoughtlessly disposing of the bracelet, disregarding its significance.
The reported offense against Steinem is said to have occurred in the aftermath of another incident where Meghan’s actions inadvertently overshadowed Steinem’s Women’s Vision Awards event earlier in the year.
Understandably, given Steinem’s lifelong dedication to championing women’s rights, the perceived disrespect towards the bracelet may have cut deep.
The emblem represented more than just a piece of jewelry; it symbolized the feminist cause that Steinem has tirelessly supported for decades.
Observing its disrespectful disposal likely felt like a personal affront to her beliefs.
Moreover, critiques hint at a broader pattern of behavior from Meghan, suggesting a propensity to exploit and manipulate older individuals.
Steinem, given her advanced age, may have been seen as an easy target for exploitation.
Reports surrounding Meghan and Harry’s high-profile projects in Hollywood, such as their Netflix ventures and upcoming memoirs, have fueled speculation that their star power may be waning.
The backlash and jests aimed at their endeavors hint at a perceived desperation to cling to relevance at any cost, even if it entails betraying revered figures like Steinem.
The fallout between Steinem and Meghan serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and sensitivities that underlie relationships within the feminist movement, where actions can carry profound implications beyond surface appearances.