Since entering the world in 2019, Archie, the son of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, has been shielded from the public eye, unlike his famous parents.
However, a recent examination of Archie’s birth certificate has sparked intrigue among royal enthusiasts due to a notable omission.
The official document identifies Harry as His Royal Highness Henry Charles Albert David Duke of Sussex, excluding the title of Prince, a departure from the customary practice observed with other royal children.
In contrast, Prince William and Prince Charles were both referred to as Prince on their children’s birth certificates.
For instance, Prince William is listed as His Royal Highness Prince William Arthur Philip Louis Duke of Cambridge on the birth certificates of Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis.
Similarly, Charles was styled as His Royal Highness Prince Charles Philip Arthur George Prince of Wales on the birth certificates of both William and Harry.
Apart from shedding light on the naming conventions, Archie’s birth certificate also disclosed previously undisclosed details surrounding his arrival.
Contrary to earlier reports of a home birth, it was confirmed that Meghan gave birth to Archie at London’s private Portland Hospital.
Notably, Meghan’s name is listed as Rachel Meghan Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Sussex, with her occupation noted as Princess of the United Kingdom.
The couple welcomed their son at 5.26 am on Monday, May 6, with Buckingham Palace confirming Prince Harry’s presence at the birth and the joyous presence of Meghan’s mother, Doria Ragland, at Frogmore Cottage.
On June 4, 2021, Harry and Meghan celebrated the birth of their second child, Lilibet Diana, in Santa Barbara.
Interestingly, Harry utilized his HRH title on Lilibet’s birth certificate, whereas Meghan’s name appeared as Rachel Markle, with Meghan being her middle name.
This revelation stirred controversy as the couple had been previously advised against using their HRH titles after stepping back from royal duties in early 2020.
A recent video by Paula M. on YouTube highlighted her efforts to seek confirmation regarding the medical personnel present during Archie’s birth at the hospital.
However, her attempt to gather information was met with unexpected challenges, as she was directed to submit a Freedom of Information Act request to the House of Commons.
Despite facing delays due to the dissolution of Parliament, she eventually received a response that raised eyebrows.
The response revealed a lack of essential documentation concerning Archie’s birth, raising concerns about his rightful place in the line of succession.
Traditionally, strict protocols were in place to ensure the legitimacy of royal births, with the Home Secretary serving as a witness.
Yet, it appears that these safeguards were overlooked in Archie’s case, casting doubts on the transparency of the process.
In light of these revelations, there is a growing call for clarity and accountability in upholding the integrity of the succession process.
It is imperative to address the discrepancies and ensure that all legal requirements are meticulously met.
Efforts to seek answers and hold those responsible accountable continue, underscoring the significance of maintaining transparency and adherence to established protocols in matters of royal lineage.