In a recent video, Sue Smith presents a theory regarding the Ngozi Fulani incident, shedding light on the connections between Misan Hariman, a long-time supporter of Harry and Meghan, and the alleged victim.
Ngozi Fulani, also known as Marlene Headley, accused Prince William’s godmother and a former lady-in-waiting to the late Queen Elizabeth of racism for simply asking about her origins.
The Sussex camp has been accused of orchestrating this scene, with Sue Smith theorizing that Misan Hariman’s involvement is the common denominator.
According to reports, Ngozi Fulani has been invited to the palace to discuss the incident and explore potential lessons to be learned.
Palace sources have confirmed that King Charles and Queen Consort Camilla will meet with Miss Fulani, indicating ongoing dialogue between the palace and her team.
However, no further details have been disclosed at this stage.
Some suspect that this situation was a deliberate setup, pointing to the fact that Fulani was wearing a microphone and Camilla appeared to be the target.
The number of coincidences surrounding this incident has raised eyebrows.
Notably, Ngozi Fulani shares a connection with Dr. Shola, as they both have the same photographer, Misan Hariman.
Shortly after the story broke, Meghan’s PR representative, Scobie, took to social media urging people to support and donate to Fulani, attempting to raise £100,000.
Furthermore, Fulani’s Twitter account features numerous tweets in support of Meghan.
These circumstances have led to allegations that Meghan may have played a role in orchestrating this incident.
Diana Epazoncora highlights the fact that Ngozi Fulani attended a gathering at Bukhanan Palace dressed in elaborate braids, African jewelry, and traditional African clothing.
While individuals have the freedom to wear whatever they please, Epazoncora suggests that Fulani’s intention was to provoke the curiosity of Lady Susan Hussey, who served Queen Elizabeth faithfully for 62 years as a lady-in-waiting.
The incident occurred during William and Catherine’s trip, courtesy of the Sussex Squad, and has had a detrimental impact on the life of an elderly woman.
Such behavior is deemed abusive.
During the event, Ngozi Fulani was wearing a microphone, reminiscent of a similar situation in the past.
It appeared as though she was waiting for someone to ask her questions.
When Lady Susan Hussey inquired about Fulani’s ancestry, the latter refused to reveal her origins, asserting her British identity instead.
Lady Susan’s innocent curiosity about Fulani’s heritage was met with resistance.
Smith argues that if she were to attend a royal event in traditional Polish dress, she would expect people to inquire about her background.
The disproportionate outrage surrounding such inquiries directed at black individuals is questioned, suggesting a double standard.
The actions of Harry and Meghan, along with their paid squad, have raised concerns about their treatment of others.
Lady Susan Hussey did not deserve to be dismissed from her position, just as Queen Elizabeth suffered greatly due to the couple’s behavior.
The question arises: will Meghan subject Susan Hussey to the same mistreatment?
It is perplexing why Harry, consumed by jealousy, allows this to happen.
The godmother of Prince William, a beloved figure, should not be subjected to such atrocious and sickening treatment.
However, those unfamiliar with the true nature of Harry and Meghan may fail to recognize the extent of their twisted behavior.
Despite the circumstances, Lady Susan persisted in her role, much like Prince Philip did.
Meghan and the Sussex squaddies could have targeted him due to his lack of political correctness, but they refrained from doing so, likely out of respect for the Queen’s husband.