Princess Eugenie made a striking appearance at the Duke of Westminster’s Society Wedding of the Year, subtly nodding to Meghan Markle’s absence through her clever fashion choices.
The princess turned heads with her ensemble, sporting a white fascinator paired elegantly with a stunning green dress that echoed Meghan’s signature style.
It seemed as though Eugenie’s outfit at the wedding of Olivia Henson and the Duke of Westminster was a tribute to one of Meghan Markle’s iconic looks, right down to the choice of footwear – Aquansura pumps akin to those favored by Meghan on previous occasions.
Eugenie’s sartorial nod to her cousin Harry’s wife, who was noticeably missing from the event due to not being invited, sparked intrigue among attendees.
The wedding ceremony at Chester Cathedral brought the ongoing rift between Prince William and Prince Harry back into the limelight.
Royal experts observed William effortlessly taking center stage over his estranged brother, even assuming the role of usher at the prestigious event.
According to royal biographer Ingrid Seward, it was expected that William would be the focal point of the wedding, given Harry’s decision to step aside after discussions with Hugh Grosvenor.
The Duke of Westminster, who holds significant roles in the lives of William’s son George and Harry’s son Archie, reportedly reached an amicable agreement with Harry for his absence, paving the way for William’s prominent involvement as an usher.
Seward highlighted Meghan’s reluctance to attend such high-profile events where she might face scrutiny, questioning the necessity for her to subject herself to potential criticism.
The guest list for the Society Wedding of the Year comprised 400 distinguished individuals, including Prince William.
Notably absent was the king, undergoing cancer treatment and engrossed in his duties related to the D-Day commemorations.
Royal commentator Michael Cole remarked on Harry’s absence as emblematic of the strained relationship between the brothers, suggesting that their presence together would only lead to discomfort.
Cole envisioned the scenario of William guiding Harry to his seat as a spectacle in itself.
Despite Harry’s non-attendance, Cole predicted that he and Meghan would extend their best wishes from Montecito, viewing Harry’s decision as a diplomatic approach to a familial issue.
Expressing disappointment, Prince Nana Akua emphasized the need for the brothers to mature and move past their differences.
Seward underscored the deep-seated discord between William and Harry, emphasizing the lack of progress in healing their fractured bond.
What was once fodder for sibling banter has now become headline news, reflecting the unfortunate state of their relationship.
Adding to the commentary, royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams opined that Harry’s absence was inevitable, given his current lifestyle in California with Meghan.
Fitzwilliams noted Harry’s genuine remorse for missing the wedding, especially considering his enduring friendship with the Duke of Westminster and the presence of many friends from his past.
The rift between the brothers was palpable, with William’s attendance seemingly influencing Harry’s decision not to participate.
Fitzwilliams concluded that the widening gap within the royal family was evident through Harry’s perceived inability to attend the ceremony despite various circumstances.
The unresolved issues between the siblings, highlighted by Harry’s absence at the significant event, underscored the complexity and depth of the familial divide, leaving little hope for imminent reconciliation.