Amidst the anticipation of her father’s upcoming 80th birthday, the Duchess of Sussex’s decision not to reach out to him has stirred allegations of hypocrisy following his recent revelations.

The estranged father expressed his desire for a simple gesture – a photograph of his grandchildren, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, whom he has yet to meet.

He lamented, “I’ve never been one for birthdays, but the one person I long to hear from, the Duchess, remains silent.”

In a candid interview with the Mail on Sunday, the duchess acknowledged her yearning to meet her grandchildren, albeit settling for a photograph at this juncture.

US royal analyst Hilary Fordwich condemned the duchess’s perceived double standards, highlighting her neglect of her father while showcasing care for others, drawing reference to Thomas Markle’s recent revelations on GB News.

Fordwich underscored the poignant rift between the duchess and her father, criticizing her selective display of empathy.

During an interview with host Mark Dolan, Fordwich expressed shock over the tragic narrative unfolding between the duchess and her father, likening it to an unexpected parallel with royalty.

She bemoaned the monarch’s obliviousness to his own grandkids, deeming it a regrettable circumstance.

Fordwich pointed to an Instagram post by the Duchess of Sussex from 2016, where she hailed her father as the greatest, as a glaring instance of hypocrisy in light of their strained relationship.

Fordwich delved into the duchess’s purported concern for others, juxtaposing it with her familial dynamics and upbringing.

She highlighted the disparity between the duchess’s public image and her private relationships, emphasizing the role her father played in her Hollywood career despite her claims of self-sufficiency.

The discussion veered towards the impact of Thomas Markle’s recent revelations on the couple’s reputation, with implications for their brand.

As Thomas Markle approaches his 80th birthday, his candid interviews have become a contentious issue for the couple, tarnishing their public image.

Fordwich echoed concerns over the duchess’s diminishing status within the royal family hierarchy, suggesting a shift from aspiring for prominence to facing obscurity.

The unraveling saga between the duchess and her father mirrors the challenges faced by the royal family, evoking sympathy for both parties.

Mark highlighted the accusations leveled against Thomas Markle regarding leaked correspondence and its detrimental effects on their relationship.

Fordwich alluded to external influences on Thomas’s actions, implying a sense of manipulation and unawareness of the repercussions.

The conversation pivoted towards the theme of hypocrisy within the family dynamics, questioning the Sussexes’ integrity amidst familial discord.

In conclusion, the intricate web of relationships and public scrutiny surrounding the Duchess of Sussex and her father underscores the complexities of familial ties amidst public visibility.

The evolving narrative sheds light on the delicate balance between personal histories, public personas, and the enduring impact of familial rifts on individual legacies.

As the saga unfolds, the nuances of empathy, accountability, and authenticity come to the fore, inviting reflection on the intersection of personal choices and public expectations.