In a stunning turn of events, Meghan Markle appears to have been effectively erased from the Royal Historical Archives, sending shockwaves through royal enthusiasts and critics alike.

This revelation, reported by the Mail on Sunday, suggests that the Duchess of Sussex has been completely omitted from the current Royal Portrait Exhibition, which showcases over a century of royal imagery.

It’s as if she never graced the halls of Buckingham Palace at all.

The absence of Meghan from this extensive collection is striking.

One would expect at least a single photograph among millions of artifacts that span five centuries.

Yet, it seems the only thing missing is any trace of the Duchess, leaving many to question the motives behind this apparent snub.

Could it be that the royal family is intentionally distancing themselves from Meghan’s controversial image?

But it doesn’t stop there.

Not only has Meghan been ghosted, but her children, Archie and Lilibet, are also nowhere to be found in the archives.

It’s a baffling situation—while royal history is filled with every imaginable moment, from mundane to monumental, the absence of these three individuals raises eyebrows.

Is this a calculated move by King Charles, or merely an oversight?

Some might argue that perhaps there simply aren’t any flattering photos of Meghan and the kids.

However, given the vastness of the Royal Collection, which includes countless images of every royal faux pas, this excuse falls flat.

The idea that not one decent photograph exists, especially from high-profile events like Meghan’s wedding, feels implausible.

This omission seems to echo a far more deliberate message from King Charles.

It’s as if he’s declaring, “Meghan who?” The act of removing her from the archives feels akin to a social media block—an outright rejection of her presence and influence within the royal narrative.

It’s a bold statement that suggests a desire to redefine the monarchy’s image moving forward.

The implications of this decision extend beyond mere photographs.

In deleting Meghan and her family from royal history, the monarchy is sending a clear signal about who they wish to be associated with.

The message is loud and clear: if you want out of the royal family, don’t expect to cling to its fame and fortune.

Critics may wonder if this approach is overly harsh.

After all, shouldn’t the royal family strive for inclusivity?

Yet, those familiar with Meghan’s tumultuous tenure as a royal might argue otherwise.

With just 72 days of official royal duties under her belt, her time in the spotlight has been marred by complaints and controversies.

The stark reality is that Meghan’s contributions to the royal legacy have been minimal.

While she may have brought some modern flair to the monarchy, her impact pales in comparison to the legacies of previous royals.

Meanwhile, Archie and Lilibet remain shrouded in mystery, adding to the intrigue surrounding their family’s current standing.

This situation raises profound questions about legacy and remembrance within the royal family.

The decision to omit Meghan and her children from historical records signifies a shift in how the monarchy wishes to be perceived.

It’s a clear delineation between those who are embraced and those who are not.

As the dust settles on this royal drama, one can only speculate about the future for Meghan and Harry.

Will they retreat into their California lifestyle, content with their celebrity status, or will they continue to challenge the monarchy?

The stakes are high, and the world is watching closely.

For now, it seems that Meghan’s aspirations to rewrite royal history have been dashed.

Rather than ascending to the heights of figures like Princess Diana, she finds herself increasingly isolated from the royal narrative.

This saga is far from over, and as events unfold, both fans and critics are left wondering what the next chapter holds for the Duchess of Sussex and her family.