Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, is receiving criticism for her recent appearance on a podcast where she made what some are calling massively egotistical claims.
The episode featured Indian actress Deepika Padukone, comedian Jenny Slate, and actress Constance Wu.
However, it was Meghan’s statements that drew the most attention, particularly from a former aide of Mrs. Thatcher.
Nile Gardner, a former aide to Margaret Thatcher, took to Twitter to express his opinion on Meghan’s podcast, describing it as “completely pointless, massively egotistical, and filled with hubris.”
This comment reflects the growing sentiment among royal fans who were quick to point out Meghan’s contradiction.
Darcey Jones and Cora, two royal fans, highlighted the inconsistency in Meghan’s narrative.
They mentioned that Meghan had changed her story from the highly publicized Oprah interview.
In that interview, Meghan claimed to have felt suicidal at one point.
However, now she states that her husband, Prince Harry, referred her to a therapist during that difficult time.
This revelation has left many questioning the authenticity of her previous statements.
Furthermore, some have raised concerns about the focus of Meghan’s podcast.
One commenter questioned whether the conversation should still revolve around labels that hold women back or real mental health issues.
They argued that these are two distinct topics and that suggesting men don’t suffer from mental health issues is sexist.
During the podcast, Meghan recounted a personal experience, saying, “I remember at my worst point being finally connected to someone that my husband had found a referral for me to call.”
She explained that she called this person while they were checking out at a grocery store.
Meghan emphasized the importance of being honest about one’s needs and not being afraid to seek help.
However, some royal fans expressed confusion and frustration with Meghan’s reliance on others to take action on her behalf.
They questioned why she couldn’t have reached out to a therapist herself and why her narrative always seems to involve someone else’s actions or lack thereof.
This sentiment was echoed by another commenter who suggested that no mental health professional would take a work call while at a grocery checkout, as it would breach confidentiality.
The backlash against Meghan’s podcast extends beyond the general public.
Royal correspondent Rupert Bell described her comments as eye-rolling, while TalkTV’s Julia Hartley Brewer accused Meghan of whinging and moaning.
Both commentators questioned whether Meghan’s negative experiences were a result of her own actions and words rather than her gender.
Bell further criticized what he referred to as Californian culture, where everything needs to be analyzed and therapy is seen as a solution for every problem.
He expressed doubt about Meghan’s claim of having significant problems, given her luxurious lifestyle.
He suggested that Meghan’s constant portrayal of herself as a victim creates a sense of self-pity and unhappiness.
Ironically, Meghan’s podcast has recently been dethroned from its top spot on the Spotify US podcast chart.
Kim Kardashian’s crime podcast, titled “The System, The Case of Kevin Keith,” has taken over the number one position.
This development marks a shift in popularity, as Meghan’s podcast had dominated the chart since its launch in August.
In her podcast, Meghan posed a rhetorical question to the audience, asking if they had ever been called crazy, hysterical, or irrational.
She then suggested that many listeners would raise their hands if they were in the same room.
This statement aimed to highlight the prevalence of negative labels faced by women.
While Meghan’s podcast continues to generate buzz, it remains a topic of controversy and debate.
Critics argue that her claims come across as egotistical and self-centered, while others question the authenticity of her narrative.
As the discussion surrounding Meghan’s podcast unfolds, it is clear that her words continue to divide opinions.