In 2019, Meghan Markle made headlines by gracing the cover of British Vogue, collaborating with then-editor Edward Enninful for what was dubbed the “Forces for Change” issue.
This edition was initially celebrated as a remarkable achievement, breaking sales records and generating significant buzz in the fashion world.
However, as time has passed, a more intricate story has emerged, revealing a narrative that invites both scrutiny and intrigue.
The much-acclaimed issue featured 15 trailblazers, handpicked by Meghan and Enninful, and was heralded as a revolutionary moment for the magazine.
It showcased a diverse array of activists, artists, and fashion icons, yet notably absent were some key figures.
Most strikingly, Queen Elizabeth II and Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, were left out—an omission that many believe could have added considerable weight and credibility to the publication.
Despite the initial praise, Tina Brown, in her book “The Palace Papers,” described the issue as a “mystifying bore” for Vogue’s traditional audience.
This raises questions about whether Meghan’s vision was more focused on creating a sensational splash rather than genuinely honoring those who are making real change in society.
The cover itself featured a mirrored panel, encouraging readers to see themselves as agents of change.
Yet, critics wondered if this was more about reflecting Meghan’s own image than fostering substantial societal progress.
Fast forward to today, and Enninful, now Vogue’s global creative and cultural advisor, has reignited discussions by inviting the original contributors to nominate a new set of game-changers.
While this move appears to celebrate trailblazers once again, it seems more like an attempt to capitalize on past success without introducing fresh content.
The new list features notable names like Yasmin Phinney and Angelina Jolie, but conspicuously absent is any acknowledgment of Meghan’s previous editorial influence or contributions.
Rumors have begun to circulate suggesting that Enninful’s initial enthusiasm for Meghan’s guest editorship may have diminished over time.
Speculation suggests that the success of the “Forces for Change” issue might not have stemmed from its content but rather from its distribution in high-profile executive lounges and studios, raising the question of whether it was truly a triumph or simply an inflated success story.
Adding another layer to this unfolding drama is the noticeable silence from both Meghan and Enninful regarding the controversial editorial choices made during the issue’s creation.
Sources close to the project indicate that Meghan, despite recommendations to include prominent figures like the Queen and Catherine, opted to ignore these suggestions.
Instead, the issue leaned heavily into self-congratulatory themes, neglecting to honor the contributions of established icons.
This decision has led to speculation about Meghan’s true motivations.
Was it a strategic choice or simply a snub?
Enninful’s reluctance to confront these controversies only fuels the fires of gossip surrounding the issue.
His recent transition to a different role within Vogue could be interpreted as an effort to distance himself from the fallout of this collaboration.
What was once hailed as a landmark edition in Vogue’s history now appears to be a complex and somewhat questionable chapter.
Although it was initially lauded for its innovative approach, the subsequent revelations about its content and decision-making process have cast a shadow over its legacy.