Each year, November 11 marks Remembrance Day in the UK and Commonwealth nations—a solemn occasion dedicated to honoring the brave members of the armed forces who have sacrificed their lives in service to their country.
Traditionally, this day sees the royal family attending a memorial service at the iconic Cenotaph in London, a poignant tribute to those who served.
However, this past Remembrance Sunday, the spotlight shifted to Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, who opted to skip the event due to her maternity leave following the birth of her daughter, Lilibet, in June.
Meghan’s absence did not go unnoticed, with some observers interpreting it as a slight against her royal duties.
Given her status, many felt she should have been present to honor the fallen.
This led to swirling rumors that Queen Elizabeth II had penned a letter expressing her disappointment over Meghan’s non-attendance.
However, these claims about the supposed letter remain unverified, as no reputable news outlets have confirmed its existence.
Both the Queen’s representatives and those for the Sussexes have remained tight-lipped about the alleged correspondence, which is consistent with their usual approach to private matters.
Without any tangible evidence of the letter, it’s essential to sift through the gossip and consider the broader context surrounding Meghan’s choice to stay home.
The Queen, as a symbolic leader, undoubtedly recognizes the significance of Remembrance Day in celebrating Britain’s veterans.
It stands to reason that she would have appreciated Meghan’s presence as a senior member of the royal family.
Yet, with Meghan recently giving birth and navigating the challenges of caring for a newborn, her decision to refrain from attending the public event seems quite reasonable.
Moreover, the ongoing pandemic adds another layer of complexity, as international travel poses health risks—particularly for new mothers.
In light of these factors, it’s clear that there are valid reasons for Meghan’s absence that extend beyond mere royal protocol.
The dynamics between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family have been under intense scrutiny since they stepped back from their royal roles last year.
Many believe that a rift has formed, fueled by unresolved tensions stemming from their departure.
The narrative around a potential scolding letter fits neatly into this storyline of familial discord, but it’s important to remember that disappointment can often be addressed through more intimate, private conversations rather than formal written communication.
While it’s true that there was disappointment over Meghan’s absence, it’s likely that any discussions about her decision took place privately among family members rather than through a formal letter.
The absence of credible evidence for the letter suggests that this rumor may be more speculative than substantiated.
As we move past the rumors, it’s crucial to examine the deeper issues still lingering within the royal family.
Meghan has faced significant criticism and unfair treatment from both the British press and public, which contributed to her and Harry’s decision to relocate to America.
The couple has openly discussed the toll that racist media coverage took on their mental health, revealing institutional shortcomings within the palace that have prompted commitments for internal reform.
While strides are being made towards addressing these issues, a sense of lingering distrust remains a barrier to healing.
Rebuilding relationships will require open dialogue and accountability from all parties involved, especially regarding past grievances.