In a surprising turn of events, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, landed in Colombia for what was meant to be an unofficial royal tour.
However, the trip quickly took a dramatic twist when Meghan confronted the Colombian Vice President, Francia Marquez, over a perceived slight regarding her title.
This incident has sparked considerable discussion about royal etiquette and the couple’s ongoing relationship with their former roles.
As the Sussexes disembarked from their private jet, the atmosphere was initially warm, with traditional Colombian bread offered to welcome them.
Yet, the mood shifted dramatically when Meghan expressed her displeasure at not being addressed as “Your Grace” or “Duchess.”
Witnesses reported that she gestured animatedly and appeared to be shouting at a visibly uncomfortable Marquez, marking a stark contrast to the cordial reception they had received moments earlier.
Sources close to the situation revealed that Meghan was genuinely upset by the Vice President’s oversight.
She interpreted the lack of formal address as a deliberate snub, one that violated the expected decorum associated with her title.
This incident has ignited a firestorm of criticism, with many questioning Meghan’s insistence on maintaining royal titles despite stepping back from official duties in 2020.
Royal commentator Ingrid Seward weighed in, suggesting that this incident exemplifies the very attitudes that have alienated Meghan from both the public and some of her supporters.
It appears she seeks acknowledgment and respect, regardless of whether it is warranted in the context of her current role.
Some advocates argue that Meghan was simply adhering to the standards of deference expected of a royal, even during informal engagements.
One supporter emphasized that Meghan’s status as a Duchess should entitle her to appropriate recognition, claiming that the Vice President’s actions were discourteous and aimed at undermining her position.
However, this perspective has not been universally accepted.
Critics argue that if Harry and Meghan wish to step away from royal responsibilities, they should also relinquish their titles and the privileges that come with them.
Tom Quinn, a royal expert, echoed this sentiment, stating that the couple cannot enjoy the benefits of royalty while simultaneously rejecting the associated obligations.
He asserted that their behavior during this diplomatic visit raises questions about their sincerity and competence in handling such delicate situations.
As the Sussexes continue their tour in Colombia, the fallout from Meghan’s outburst could have long-lasting repercussions.
Their mission, which aims to advocate for online safety for children and highlight local activists’ efforts, now faces scrutiny in light of this incident.
Observers are left wondering if this confrontation will hinder their ability to effectively promote these significant issues.
Royal author Anna Pasternak criticized Meghan’s conduct, arguing that it contradicts the image they should project as representatives of goodwill.