In a surprising turn of events, the upcoming tour of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to Colombia has stirred up a wave of skepticism among royal insiders.
Following their recent visit to Nigeria, this decision has drawn sharp criticism from former courtiers and royal commentators alike.
An ex-member of the royal court shared concerns about the couple’s apparent disregard for established royal customs, suggesting that their behavior reflects a troubling disrespect towards both the monarchy and its time-honored traditions.
Traditionally, royal visits serve as a means to bolster diplomatic relationships and foster international friendships on behalf of Britain.
Yet, the Sussexes’ planned tour seems to contradict this purpose, raising eyebrows across the board.
Despite their intentions, there’s an undeniable tension surrounding their public persona, which still aligns itself with British royalty, even as they navigate this new chapter away from it.
The criticism highlights the growing frustration within the royal family regarding Harry and Meghan’s public engagements.
The former courtier emphasized that this situation underscores why the royal institution seeks to distance itself from the couple.
This sentiment was echoed when Harry faced a significant setback during his anticipated trip to Colombia: a luxury hotel abruptly canceled his five-star reservation.
According to a report from the Royal Saga YouTube channel, insiders at the hotel cited unforeseen circumstances for the cancellation, but speculation suggests that local discontent towards the Sussexes may have influenced their decision.
Reports indicate that many Colombians are unhappy with Prince Harry’s impending visit, a sentiment that seems to have contributed to the hotel’s withdrawal of accommodations.
This ongoing backlash against the couple, coupled with their perceived sense of entitlement and relentless media spotlight since stepping back from royal duties, has forced them to reconsider their plans for Colombia.
Choosing to visit a country known for its high crime rates raises eyebrows, especially in light of Harry’s recent security concerns back in the UK.
The prince has expressed disappointment over the lack of support from King Charles regarding his legal battles over security provisions.
However, it is essential to clarify that such decisions typically fall under government jurisdiction rather than royal influence.
A royal insider firmly stated that it would be inappropriate for King Charles to intervene directly in matters of security.
Yet, a close ally of Harry countered this by suggesting that as a father, the king could indeed play a role if he chose to do so.
This debate only adds to the complexity of the situation, highlighting the tangled web of family dynamics and institutional responsibilities.
Commentator Richard Fitzwilliams noted that Harry and Meghan appear to be taking deliberate jabs at their former institution.
By addressing sensitive topics that could potentially embarrass the royal family, they risk transitioning from subtle critiques to outright condemnation.
While some may interpret their actions as efforts for reform within the monarchy, others perceive them as self-serving maneuvers that detract from pressing social issues.
The fallout from recent events, including the revealing Oprah interview, continues to cast a long shadow over the royal family.
Many believe that instead of focusing on those who genuinely need assistance, Harry and Meghan’s actions draw attention to themselves amidst the ongoing struggles of Queen Elizabeth II and her family.
Fitzwilliams pointed out that this feud significantly influences public perception of everyone involved.