A recent news story claiming that a shocked mother bumped into Meghan Markle and Prince Harry while they were out to lunch has left many questioning its credibility.

The article, which appeared on the Daily Mail, depicts the royal couple as kind and loving, with Meghan even discussing their invisible daughter, Princess Lilibet.

However, the questionable nature of the story has raised doubts about its authenticity.

The headline alone gives away the fabricated nature of the article.

Describing Meghan as “so kind” is a stretch, as her reputation has not been synonymous with kindness.

Furthermore, the mention of Princess Lilibet, their invisible daughter, only adds to the absurdity of the narrative.

It seems that this piece may have originated from Meghan’s talent agency, WME, rather than being a genuine encounter.

According to reports, the alleged encounter was captured in a TikTok video.

TikTok, known for its viral and often questionable content, is not a platform that inspires confidence.

It is no surprise that a video portraying Meghan as kind would surface on such a platform.

The fact that Meghan and Harry would approach a stranger, waving and walking towards her, contradicts their supposed obsession with privacy.

The article continues with a bizarre description of Meghan’s attire, stating that she looked effortlessly chic in expensive designer clothing.

However, the claim that Meghan is 33 years old raises eyebrows.

Various sources suggest that Meghan is pushing 50, and even Meghan herself has acknowledged being in her forties.

Such inaccuracies raise doubts about the credibility of the entire story.

The woman featured in the TikTok video claimed that Meghan and Harry were kind and loving towards her and her family.

However, it is unclear who this woman is and why she would describe the royal couple in such glowing terms.

The notion that Meghan and Harry are mirrors of each other in their love and kindness is questionable, given recent public appearances where they appeared distant and strained.

The article concludes with the father of the woman expressing his emotional response to the encounter.

However, the over-the-top nature of his reaction only adds to the skepticism surrounding the story.

It is evident that efforts are being made to rehabilitate Meghan’s image, but the lack of believability in this narrative undermines its purpose.

It is intriguing to consider the thought process behind these absurd puff pieces.

Whether Meghan is the mastermind behind these stories or her talent agency is responsible remains unknown.

Nonetheless, media outlets like the Daily Mail seem willing to publish such content for the sake of generating clicks.

However, it is concerning that Meghan and Harry would prefer a media landscape where only positive articles about them are permitted.

Suppressing freedom of speech and censoring the media would undermine democracy.

The use of exaggerated language to describe the couple, such as “so kind” and “mirrors of each other in their love and kindness,” is far from accurate and does not reflect public opinion.

Ultimately, Meghan’s history of dishonesty raises questions about the purpose of these fabrications.

Her lies are often outlandish and easily debunked, leaving one to wonder why she continues to engage in such behavior.

It is clear that the public remains skeptical of these chance encounters, and the comments section reflects the doubts surrounding the authenticity of the story.

In conclusion, the recent news story about Meghan and Harry’s chance encounter with a fan raises more questions than answers.

The lack of believability, inconsistencies, and exaggerated language used in the article have led many to question its credibility.

As Meghan and Harry’s popularity continues to decline, their desperate attempts to win over the public with such stories only serve to further erode their reputation.