In a recent discussion on GB News, commentator Michael Crick floated the idea that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex might consider relocating to a remote corner of New Zealand.
This suggestion arose in light of concerns regarding the potential re-election of Donald Trump and the implications it could have for the couple’s residency in the United States.
Crick expressed skepticism about reports that the Duke’s visa could be revoked, labeling such claims as “candy floss”—a term he used to imply they lack substance.
He confidently asserted that if the Duke were to face any visa issues, it would be far more prudent for the couple to vacation in Australia rather than return to the UK.
“This isn’t going to happen,” he declared emphatically.
The commentator also raised eyebrows about the U.S. immigration policies concerning individuals with a history of drug use.
He questioned why anyone who has admitted to past narcotics use would face immediate deportation, suggesting that there are well-paid attorneys in the States capable of crafting strong defenses against such actions.
Crick emphasized his belief in fair treatment for all, expressing surprise at the swift deportation of those with previous drug use admissions.
Interestingly, last month, Donald Trump made headlines by stating that he would take action if the Duke of Sussex had lied about his drug history on his visa application.
This remark came during an interview with Nigel Farage, who probed the Duke about whether he deserved special treatment due to his royal status.
The Duke firmly responded that he should not receive any privileges and urged for a thorough investigation into any allegations of dishonesty regarding his drug use.
When questioned about the likelihood of the Duke of Sussex remaining in America, Trump’s response was somewhat evasive, suggesting that it was up to others to keep him informed about the situation.
This implies that there may have been ongoing discussions regarding the Duke’s status that are not publicly known.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have not shied away from voicing their discontent with the royal family, particularly after stepping back from their official duties.
In his autobiography, “Spare,” the Duke laid bare his grievances, notably targeting Prince William and Princess Catherine, who is now the Queen.
Rumors have circulated that the Duke enjoyed some form of preferential treatment when applying for his U.S. visa, a claim that has become a point of contention.
His candid discussions about his past drug use have only added to the scrutiny surrounding his residency status.
Last year, the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, issued a challenge demanding transparency regarding the Duke’s visa application.
This call for disclosure has fueled further speculation about the couple’s future in the U.S.
As the situation unfolds, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex continue to navigate a complex web of public opinion and legal considerations.