Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, inadvertently let slip that she may not be the hands-on mother she portrays herself to be during a backstage interview at Variety magazine’s Power of Women event in Los Angeles.

The British Royal Family News is abuzz with speculation about her true intentions and upcoming projects.

When questioned about her future endeavors, Meghan coyly hinted at exciting new ventures she and her husband, Prince Harry, are working on but refrained from divulging any details, according to the Daily Mail.

Adding fuel to the fire, a reporter inquired about Meghan’s favorite holiday tradition.

The Duchess responded with enthusiasm, stating, “That’s a great question!

Our little ones are little, and we’re enjoying every moment of that.”

However, this seemingly innocent remark has raised eyebrows, as it contradicts her previous claims of being a devoted mother.

Critics argue that her generic and detached responses regarding her children’s activities suggest a lack of genuine involvement in their lives.

Meghan’s inability to provide specific details or express joy when discussing her offspring has only fueled further skepticism.

This incident is not an isolated occurrence.

In the past, Meghan has struggled to maintain consistency in her narrative surrounding her children.

During the Invictus Games, she fabricated a story about buying them milkshakes, which later turned out to be false.

Additionally, she consistently refers to her children as “the little ones,” a term that lacks the personal touch one would expect from a doting parent.

It seems that Meghan’s discomfort with unscripted questions leads her to distance herself from the role of a mother, reinforcing the perception that she prioritizes image control over authenticity.

In another interview with an entertainment reporter, Meghan attempted to discuss philanthropy but stumbled through her words, leaving many unimpressed.

Critics argue that her philanthropic efforts have been lackluster, with little evidence of substantial contributions or support for women in need.

Observers noted her anxious demeanor, punctuated by forced smiles and nods, as she struggled to navigate unexpected questions.

It appears that Meghan craves attention and the spotlight but is selective about the level of control she maintains over the narrative.

To be considered a genuine philanthropist, significant financial donations are expected.

Similarly, to establish oneself as a valuable figure in the entertainment industry, one must possess a string of accolades, ongoing projects, lucrative fashion contracts, and a massive social media following.

Meghan falls short on all these fronts, leading critics to label her as a wannabe A-list Z-lister.

Furthermore, supporting women would require more than just token gestures; it would entail substantial donations to reputable causes and responsible financial behavior.

Critics argue that Meghan’s acceptance of taxpayer-funded privileges contradicts her supposed commitment to supporting women from diverse backgrounds.

As news of Meghan Markle’s slip-up spreads, the public is left questioning her authenticity and commitment to her proclaimed roles as a mother, philanthropist, and entertainer.

The incident serves as a reminder that carefully crafted narratives can only hold up for so long before cracks begin to show.

Whether Meghan can regain trust and credibility remains to be seen, but for now, her slip of the tongue has cast doubt on her claims and intentions.