In a story that’s tugging at heartstrings, Pippa Middleton, sister to Princess Catherine, and her billionaire spouse, James Matthews, find themselves in hot water with their neighbors.

The couple is at the center of a heated dispute in their West Berkshire village, following their decision to block access to a cherished footpath that has long been used by locals.

The drama unfolded when the couple closed off a lane leading to their opulent $29 million estate.

Previously owned by renowned design mogul Sir Terence Conran, the estate allowed villagers to stroll along a picturesque path that meandered toward the mansion’s private driveway.

However, it seems that the new owners have decided to put an end to this longstanding practice by erecting signs declaring “private, no public access” and “no trespassing.”

Local residents are incensed, labeling the couple’s actions as outrageous.

Many have voiced their disappointment, urging Pippa and James to reconsider their decision.

One neighbor, who has enjoyed walks along the path for half a century, lamented, “When Sir Terence owned it, he had no objections.

He was very nice and involved in the village.

We should have the right to roam.”

Another villager echoed these sentiments, describing the path as a lovely walk and expressing frustration over what they perceive as the couple’s overly protective stance on their property.

“We’re quiet villagers.

We don’t have vandalism around here,” they said, adding that it feels like Pippa and James are robbing the community of a valuable amenity.

On the flip side, some locals argue that the couple is well within their rights to restrict access.

They point out that while the previous owner allowed public use of the path, it was never officially designated as a right-of-way.

“If it were their house or garden, would they want anyone walking through it?”

one resident questioned.

The sentiment is clear: while the Matthews have chosen to exercise their rights, many feel a sense of loss.

Pippa, who married hedge fund manager James Matthews in 2017, now resides in a lavish $15 million home with their three children: Arthur, Grace, and Rose.

The couple’s estate spans 145 acres and boasts 32 rooms, making it a stunning backdrop for family life.

However, their recent decision to block the footpath has sparked a firestorm of debate among the community.

Back in March, the couple took steps to formalize their claim to the land by submitting a highway declaration notice to West Berkshire Council.

This move clearly delineated their private territory, although the official status of the road remains pending.

The luxurious Georgian mansion, acquired in 2021, is set amidst 150 acres of beautiful countryside.

In 2022, concerns arose regarding the historic integrity of the property after the couple made significant alterations, including the removal of a large walled garden to install a massive swimming pool.

Additionally, there were worries about potential Middle Stone Age sites in the vicinity, as the area is known for its natural beauty and ancient woodlands.

In stark contrast to her sister, Princess Catherine, who now resides in a modest four-bedroom home at Adelaide Cottage, the Matthews’ lifestyle appears extravagant.

The Wales family downsized significantly after Queen Elizabeth’s passing, moving from the grandeur of Kensington Palace to their new abode in Windsor Home Park.

Princess Catherine and Prince William previously occupied Apartment 1 at Kensington Palace, a sprawling 20-room residence that was home to Princess Margaret, the late sister of Queen Elizabeth.

Their current home allows them to enjoy a more down-to-earth lifestyle while remaining close to Windsor Castle, which is just a short stroll away.

As the local dispute continues to unfold, the community watches closely, wondering how this clash between the elite and everyday villagers will play out.

Will Pippa and James reconsider their stance, or will they stand firm in their decision to keep the pathway closed?

Only time will tell how this story develops, but for now, it highlights the delicate balance between private property rights and community traditions.