The British royal family news circuit is abuzz with speculation surrounding Meghan Markle’s recent revelation during a backstage interview at the Power of Women event.

The Duchess of Sussex accidentally let slip that she may not be a mother, raising questions about her future plans and sparking rumors of a potential comeback.

During the interview, which took place at Variety magazine’s Power of Women event in Los Angeles, Markle stumbled when asked about her upcoming projects.

She refrained from sharing any specific details but hinted at exciting new ventures she and her husband Prince Harry are working on, eagerly awaiting the moment to make official announcements, as reported by the Daily Mail.

However, it was her response to a question about her favorite holiday tradition that caught everyone’s attention.

Markle’s answer left many puzzled as she replied, “That’s a great question.

Our little ones are little, and we’re enjoying every moment of that.”

This raised eyebrows, as it seemed as though she was distancing herself from the role of a parent.

She carefully avoided mentioning her children and provided no substantial information about them.

This isn’t the first time Markle has faced scrutiny regarding her motherhood claims.

Previously, she had claimed to have bought milkshakes for her kids at the Invictus Games, a statement that was later debunked.

Additionally, she consistently refers to her children as “the little ones,” which further adds to the perception that she is trying to detach herself from the responsibilities of being a mother.

It appears that Markle struggles when confronted with unscripted questions, often prioritizing control over her public image.

Even during casual interviews, she relies on rehearsed gestures such as soft blinks, controlled smiles, and pageant-worthy eye contact while waiting for the interviewer to move on.

This discomfort becomes evident when faced with unexpected or unwanted inquiries, despite her evident desire to be the center of attention.

In another interview with an entertainment reporter, Markle discussed her philanthropic endeavors, which proved to be an awkward affair.

Her words seemed scattered and lacked meaningful substance.

Furthermore, her track record in philanthropy is underwhelming, and her contributions to the entertainment industry fall short of A-list status.

While she frequently speaks about supporting women, her absence during strikes and her focus on maintaining her image raise doubts about her true intentions.

Genuine philanthropy requires substantial donations to worthy causes, rather than mere gestures for show.

Similarly, success in the entertainment industry demands a string of A-list awards, a continuous stream of projects, lucrative fashion contracts, and a significant social media following.

Unfortunately, Markle falls short in all these areas, positioning her as more of a wannabe A-lister or, at best, a Z-lister.

If Markle genuinely aims to support women, it would necessitate actions beyond token gestures.

It would involve refraining from accepting taxpayer-funded perks and privileges, especially if they come at the expense of working-class individuals, people of color, the elderly, disabled individuals, and frontline workers.

Despite her approach of extracting benefits from the system, she fails to provide public services to the taxpayers worldwide.

The truth behind Meghan Markle’s motherhood remains shrouded in mystery.