As the political landscape in the United States shifts, speculation is growing regarding the future of Meghan Markle’s title as the Duchess of Sussex.

With a potential return of Donald Trump to the White House on the horizon, questions are arising about whether a new administration could strip her of this title.

The once-admired royal couple now finds themselves navigating a more hostile political environment, putting their comfortable life in California at risk.

Rumors are swirling that Trump, who has been vocally critical of Meghan and Harry, may target her royal title.

Many argue that it was bestowed upon her by a foreign monarchy, raising the debate about whether American citizens can hold such titles without facing repercussions.

This controversy has ignited passionate discussions, particularly among those who believe that under a leader like Trump, who has frequently criticized the couple, the U.S. government might take action.

Political commentator Lee Cohen recently shared his thoughts on the matter, suggesting that the Sussexes’ past decisions, including their controversial exit from royal responsibilities and ongoing tensions with the British royal family, could lead to consequences.

Cohen hinted that their perceived missteps might come back to haunt them, especially in light of the current political climate.

But what’s the legal standing on this issue?

Some social media posts have pointed to a clause in the U.S. Constitution that supposedly prohibits American citizens from holding foreign titles.

This provision was proposed in 1810 during a time of strained relations between the U.S. and the U.K., yet it never gained the necessary support to be ratified.

Although the amendment aimed to prevent U.S. citizens from being influenced by foreign royalty, it remains more of a historical curiosity than an enforceable law.

D.C. attorney John Witherspoon has offered a detailed legal perspective, clarifying that while the 1810 proposal exists in the Constitution, it never became law.

He explains that U.S. citizens can inherit and use foreign titles, provided they do not pledge allegiance to another country.

This means that Meghan could retain her title without jeopardizing her American citizenship, as long as she doesn’t swear loyalty to the U.K. or any other nation.

Despite this legal clarity, the rumors persist, particularly with Trump’s potential return to power.

During his first term, Trump was an outspoken critic of the Sussexes, often taking issue with Harry’s decision to step back from royal duties.

He even suggested that Harry was being manipulated, echoing sentiments held by many who believe that the couple has strained their relationship with the royal family.

As Trump’s administration could revisit contentious issues, some speculate whether Meghan’s title might become a target amid renewed political scrutiny.

His disdain for the couple is well-documented, and he has made it clear that he feels no obligation to cover the financial costs associated with their security, insisting that they should bear those expenses themselves.

As tensions between the Sussexes and the U.S. government rise, it’s easy to envision a scenario where Trump or his allies might focus on Meghan’s royal title.

The political climate is ripe for such discussions, and the former president’s history of criticism towards the couple adds fuel to the fire.

In this charged atmosphere, the future of Meghan Markle’s title remains uncertain.

While legal experts assert that she can legally hold her title, the political implications of her status are anything but clear.