In a significant twist in the ongoing divorce saga between Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, a California Superior Court judge has dealt a substantial blow to Markle’s financial strategies.

The court’s recent decision to dismiss her extraordinary claim to Harry’s $80 million trust fund marks a pivotal moment in what has quickly become one of the most scrutinized divorces of our time.

The legal proceedings have unveiled Markle’s aggressive attempts to tap into a sizable trust fund that has been in place for generations, courtesy of the British royal family.

This bold move has not gone unnoticed, drawing considerable criticism as many see it as an effort to leverage her fleeting role as a working royal.

Observers of the royal family have pointed out that this behavior mirrors the very concerns that arose when Markle first entered the royal fold.

A former palace aide, who requested anonymity, shared insights into the situation, stating, “This was never about love.”

From the outset, there seemed to be a calculated approach to ascend into one of the world’s most illustrious families, followed by a systematic dismantling of age-old traditions, culminating in this overt quest for wealth.

The ruling came after an exhaustive 12-hour hearing, during which Harry’s legal team effectively argued that the trust fund—containing inheritances from both Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Diana—is explicitly safeguarded by British law and predates their marriage.

Legal analysts had predicted this outcome, with many questioning the audacity of attempting to claim funds that are clearly marked as personal inheritance.

Tensions escalated in the courtroom as evidence emerged, suggesting Markle’s long-term strategy aimed at achieving financial independence through her royal connections.