The anticipation surrounding the closing ceremony of the Invictus Games has quickly turned into disappointment, with critics likening it to one of the most underwhelming events in recent memory.

Robin McVicar, the Chief Operating Officer of the Invictus Games, insists that excitement is in the air, but many observers are left wondering if there’s a sense of desperation lurking behind the scenes.

On November 20, the lineup of performers was unveiled, featuring acts like Bare n^ked Ladies, Jelly Roll, and the duo Warren Treaty.

Jelly Roll, who is perhaps better recognized for his connection to a tattoo on Harry’s neck than for his musical prowess, has been described as a rather mediocre artist.

While he brings an unpredictable energy to the stage, one can’t help but question the event’s credibility when the headliner is more famous for his ink than his melodies.

The Bare n^ked Ladies, a Canadian band that thrived in the 1990s, seem to have become a relic of nostalgia.

While they once captured the spotlight, their current relevance feels diminished, leaving audiences to wonder if their performance will elicit anything more than polite applause.

Many attendees might find themselves searching for their name online as the tunes play in the background.

Then there’s Warren Treaty, who, despite their charm, remain largely unknown to the general public.

This sentiment reflects the overall reaction to the entire lineup, which has left many scratching their heads in confusion.

McVicar has stated that Prince Harry had a hand in selecting these acts, but it seems more plausible that he aimed for big-name stars and received lukewarm responses instead.

It’s disheartening to witness the Invictus Games—an event originally designed to honor wounded service members—reduced to this lackluster affair.

With a royal figure at the helm, one would expect a more impressive outcome.

The involvement of certain individuals has sparked controversy, often characterized by attention-seeking antics and a disregard for military decorum.

It almost feels like a red carpet was rolled out just for them.

David Foster, who is often referred to as Harry’s second father, has been notably absent from this planning process.

Why hasn’t he stepped up to curate a star-studded lineup for his son?

After all, he has collaborated with icons like Celine Dion and Andrea Bocelli.

Instead, we are left with a lineup that feels more like an afterthought, as if Foster looked at Harry’s aspirations for the Invictus Games and decided, “Not my circus, not my monkeys.”

There has been considerable chatter about attracting high-profile performers, such as Beyoncé.

If Harry allocated even a fraction of his budget for extravagant photo opportunities, he might have been able to entice Queen Bey for a cool million or two.

Instead, we’re stuck with a lineup that resembles a participation trophy rather than a celebration of talent.

Let’s also consider the absence of Michael Bublé, the beloved Canadian crooner.

It seems he prefers to steer clear of this spectacle, likely opting for corporate gigs over aligning himself with a headliner whose main claim to fame is a tattoo.

Bublé’s choice speaks volumes about the current state of the event.

The ticket sales for the closing ceremony are raising eyebrows as well.

It appears that central casting may need to arrange for a busload of attendees to fill the seats.

Any 80s one-hit wonder could have been resurrected to deliver a more memorable performance than what is currently on the docket.

In a world where artists like Taylor Swift, Katy Perry, Celine Dion, or even Justin Bieber could have graced the stage, the current selection feels like a missed opportunity.