Recently, shocking rumors have emerged surrounding the pregnancy of Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex.

Speculations about her alleged use of a surrogate mother have been circulating, and now, new evidence seems to support these claims.

It all started when a Twitter account, going by the name Lucy, surfaced, claiming to be the surrogate for a duchess in the UK.

This revelation has left many questioning the authenticity of Meghan’s pregnancy.

According to Lucy, she was taken to a secret apartment near Frogmore Cottage for close monitoring during the pregnancy.

She described Meghan as a demanding person, constantly checking her menu and schedule, and expecting strict obedience.

These revelations have fueled doubts about Meghan’s pregnancy, as it raises the question of how someone who has never experienced pregnancy could understand the needs of a pregnant person.

Furthermore, the surrogate alleges that Meghan failed to fulfill their contractual agreement.

Supposedly, the surrogate was promised a payment of $500,000 if the baby was born healthy.

However, when Archie was born, Meghan cunningly refused to pay the full amount, claiming that the contract had not been completely fulfilled.

This revelation adds another layer of complexity to the already controversial situation.

Photographic evidence has also emerged, intensifying the speculation.

People on Twitter have shared pictures of Meghan with two different-sized bumps on the same day or a significant bump followed by a smaller one the next day.

These images, along with Prince Harry’s statement about the baby changing over two weeks, raise eyebrows.

How could a child just a few days old undergo such drastic changes?

Adding to the confusion, Meghan’s father has previously mentioned that she had undergone a hysterectomy.

This revelation suggests that Harry might not have been aware of this information when he married Meghan.

These revelations have led many to believe that the surrogacy claims hold some truth.

However, it is important to note that there is no evidence suggesting that the Royal Family had any knowledge of this alleged surrogacy.

It seems unlikely that they would have been complicit in such a deception.

If they were aware, it could potentially be a secret they hold over Meghan to maintain her silence and distance from the family.

The absence of concrete proof has led some to question the existence of Meghan and Harry’s children altogether.

Skeptics argue that there have been no public appearances or pictures of the children that differ from one another.

They wonder why Meghan doesn’t speak up and clarify the situation if the children truly exist.

Furthermore, critics argue that Meghan’s age, along with her previous miscarriage, would have required her to give birth in a hospital for safety reasons.

The term “geriatric pregnancy” is often used to describe pregnancies in women over the age of 35.

Considering these factors, it seems unlikely that Meghan would have been allowed to give birth anywhere other than a hospital.

Some intriguing details surrounding Meghan’s behavior have also come to light.

When discussing her podcast before its debut, Meghan emphasized that people should expect the “real” her.

However, she seemed reluctant to engage with experts on childbirth trauma.

This raises questions about why she avoided such discussions and what she may be hiding.

In a social media post, Allison, a producer, shared a photo in front of Gimlet, an audio production house, and thanked Faris Afarfi for being an excellent interviewer.

While it appears that Allison did not interview Meghan directly, close friends of Meghan, including Melody Hobson, Jamila Jamil, and Serena Williams, were featured in conversations with the duchess.

According to a source, Meghan declined a face-to-face interview with Allison for her own undisclosed reasons.

Even when offered remote support from Dr.

Mover via telephone, Meghan rejected the offer.

She has consistently avoided face-to-face discussions about her birthing process, despite openly discussing it in the media.

This selective approach to sharing her experiences has raised suspicions among observers.

The timing of Meghan’s public revelation about her miscarriage is also worth noting.

Some argue that it was a calculated move to generate publicity for a new project.

This deliberate timing raises questions about the authenticity of her intentions and whether she used personal experiences for strategic gains.