In the ever-fascinating realm of royalty, a curious spectacle unfolds as critics of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle continue to voice their disdain.

Ironically, these same critics seem blissfully unaware that they, too, are reaping financial rewards from the very gossip they condemn.

This glaring contradiction raises eyebrows and begs the question: how can one profit from royal drama while denouncing those who do the same?

Take Tom Bower, for instance.

This notorious royal biographer has made a career out of scrutinizing the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

His recent comments on the couple’s Netflix documentary announcement coincided suspiciously with a health update about Kate Middleton, showcasing an opportunistic flair that is hard to ignore.

Here we see a man who thrives on royal controversies, yet he feels justified in criticizing Harry and Meghan for their own ventures.

The hypocrisy here is astonishing.

Critics like Bower have built their livelihoods on the very narratives they deride.

They brand themselves as guardians of royal propriety, yet their actions suggest otherwise.

They eagerly profit from the lives of Harry and Meghan while simultaneously casting judgment on their choices.

It’s a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black, and it’s playing out in full view of the public.

Let’s take a step back and consider the broader context.

These self-proclaimed protectors of royal decorum are cashing in on the very couple they vilify.

They seem quick to point fingers at Harry and Meghan’s decisions, all while conveniently ignoring their own lucrative pursuits.

It’s a display of irony that deserves recognition.

In this ecosystem of royal gossip, figures like Bower have mastered the art of turning royal events into best-selling books and television appearances.

Their success hinges on the very stories they criticize, raising the question of why it’s acceptable for them to profit while Harry and Meghan are shamed for doing the same.

Isn’t it time to call out this double standard?

The critics have positioned themselves as the ultimate arbiters of what is appropriate behavior for royals.

Yet, in their quest for righteousness, they overlook their own financial gain from the very narratives they condemn.

This duplicity highlights a troubling trend where those who profit from royal drama are often the loudest critics of those entangled in it.

Harry and Meghan’s decision to step away from royal duties and forge their own path has not shielded them from scrutiny.

Instead, it seems to have intensified the criticism they face.

The irony lies in the fact that while they seek independence, their critics continue to exploit their royal ties for profit.

It’s as if a spider has spun a web around them, trapping them in a narrative they’re trying to escape.

This metaphorical spider feeds off every detail of Harry and Meghan’s lives, crafting sensational stories that capture public attention.

Meanwhile, the critics enjoy the spoils of their labor, all the while chastising the couple for attempting to break free from the web.

The absurdity of this situation cannot be overstated.

What we witness here is not just blatant hypocrisy; it’s also a reflection of societal expectations placed on Harry and Meghan.

They are expected to adhere to archaic royal protocols while their critics reap the benefits of their defiance.

It’s a glaring example of the double standards that permeate our culture, particularly when it comes to the media’s treatment of public figures.

In this dance of dependency, royal critics thrive on the very narratives they seek to undermine.

They craft columns, publish books, and make appearances, all under the guise of royal commentary.

Yet, the more they attack, the more they profit.

It’s an exploitative cycle that favors the critics, leaving Harry and Meghan to bear the brunt of the public’s scrutiny.

As we reflect on this dynamic, it’s clear that the critics must take a long, hard look in the mirror.

They need to acknowledge their own role in perpetuating this cycle of exploitation.

Without Harry and Meghan’s ongoing saga, their narratives would lack the richness that fuels their careers.

Recognizing this parasitic relationship is essential for fostering a more balanced discourse surrounding the royals.

This exploration into the world of royal critics reveals a tapestry woven with threads of audacity, irony, and hypocrisy.

As we peel back the layers, we see that those who claim to uphold the sanctity of the monarchy are often the very ones profiting from its drama.

It’s time to confront these contradictions head-on and demand a fairer treatment of individuals seeking to carve their own paths.