Grammy-winner David Foster is set to take the stage once again at the renowned Wynn’s Encore Theatre.
His highly anticipated show, An Intimate Evening with David Foster, Hitman Tour, will captivate audiences during a two-night engagement on June 23 and June 24.
Joining him on stage will be some special guests, including his talented wife, singer, and actress Catherine McPhee, as well as renowned vocalists Pia Toscano and Daniel Emmett, among others.
Recently, David Foster made a surprising revelation.
He turned down an invitation to Lilibet’s birthday celebration, opting for other commitments instead.
This decision came from someone who had never met the birthday celebrant.
It seems that David Foster has been questioning the existence of children, sparking curiosity and speculation surrounding this matter.
His suspicions were further piqued when Prince Harry and his wife did not bring their two children to King Charles’ coronation.
Despite the occasion being a milestone in the royal family, there was not a single photo of the birthday twins.
It raises the question of whether Meghan could not find someone to stand in for Archie and Lilibet.
Some of Meghan’s neighbors have reportedly confirmed that they have never seen the Sussex children.
When David Foster dared to ask Meghan about their whereabouts, she became furious.
Why is it that no one ever catches a glimpse of them?
Some even question if Meghan was ever pregnant, as her baby bump seemed to change size and shape.
It is perplexing how one day she appeared as flat as a pancake, while on others, she looked like a woman overdue by two months.
Her belly seemed to sag and deflate.
But do these children truly exist?
Adding fuel to the fire, Samantha Markle, Meghan’s half-sister, has raised doubts about the existence of Archie Harrison and Lilibet Diana.
During an interview with LBC, Samantha shared logical conspiracy theories suggesting that Archie and Lilibet may not be real.
She even pointed out that their own father, Thomas Markle, has not seen the children’s full frontal faces.
These revelations shed light on why David Foster’s family suddenly distanced themselves from the Sussexes.
It is intriguing to note that when the two couples dined together in Macedo, there was a great deal of fanfare surrounding the event.
The Sussexes even brought along a photographer to capture their arrival and departure.
However, the Fosters were notably absent from the photographs, leaving doubts about whether the four actually met.
One would assume that the conversation would revolve around Catherine Foster’s pregnancy announcement, but when David Foster inquired about Archie, he was met with a stern response: “Don’t even go there.”
This reaction clearly indicates that discussing children and pregnancy is off-limits.
Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that the name “Lilibet” has caused quite a stir.
As a British expat, I recall my time living in England, where her personal family name was rarely mentioned.
It added a touch of humanity to the Queen, giving her a nickname.
However, since the emergence of this controversial couple, the name “Lilibet” has been repeated incessantly.
It is disheartening to witness the exploitation of a pet name that held sentimental value for the Queen, associated as it was with her father, mother, and sister.
This couple’s continuous lies seem to spread like a contagious disease, infecting the world with their deceit.
In conclusion, it is difficult to believe that Meghan would extend an invitation to her invisible daughter or son’s birthday celebration.
Such claims appear too absurd to be taken seriously.
The constant drama surrounding this couple has become tiresome, and it is time to move on from their relentless pursuit of attention.