In a move that many are labeling as a calculated publicity stunt, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s recent visit to fire stations in Los Angeles has sparked fierce criticism from media personality Megyn Kelly.

Known for her no-nonsense approach, Kelly did not hold back in her assessment of what she views as the couple’s transparent attempt to maintain relevance amid dwindling public interest.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex made headlines as they toured several fire stations that had been affected by recent wildfires.

Their stated goal was to show support for first responders, but critics like Kelly quickly dismissed the visit as little more than a spectacle of performative compassion.

“Let’s be real,” Kelly asserted on her show, emphasizing her belief that Harry and Meghan are far removed from the royal status they once held.

“We fought hard to ensure we wouldn’t have to bow down to British royalty, yet here they come, expecting us to fawn over their staged photo ops.”

Kelly took particular issue with Meghan’s seemingly rehearsed poses during their visit, accusing her of engaging in what she called “performance activism.”

She noted how each stop appeared meticulously planned to maximize media exposure rather than genuinely connect with those affected by the fires.

“It’s curious how they always manage to tip off the press before these so-called spontaneous acts of goodwill,” Kelly remarked, raising an eyebrow at the couple’s timing.

Describing the event as a masterclass in “celebrity humanitarian theatre,” Kelly pointed out the couple’s carefully curated appearances.

Meghan, dressed in designer casual wear, smiled sympathetically at firefighters while Harry played the supportive spouse.

Critics argue this is merely another chapter in their ongoing quest for redemption in America.

“What are they really contributing here?”

Kelly challenged her audience.

“These are professionals who need tangible support, not a former actress’ rehearsed concern or a royal’s fleeting presence.”

The timing of their visit raised eyebrows, especially since public fascination with the couple has begun to wane.

Their Netflix venture hasn’t made the splash they anticipated, and their Spotify partnership ended without much fanfare.

Kelly suggested that this latest public appearance reeks of desperation, a strategic maneuver to claw back into the public consciousness.

What seems to infuriate her most is the couple’s duality: they wish to leverage their royal connections while simultaneously criticizing the institution that afforded them their fame.

“They want it both ways,” Kelly observed.

“They’re quick to flaunt their titles when it benefits them but are the first to complain about the monarchy when it garners attention.”

Their fire station tour, which featured staged photo opportunities and brief interactions, seemed to prioritize media coverage over genuine engagement.

Kelly criticized the couple’s team for orchestrating every moment, from their arrival to the angles captured by the cameras.

“What we’re witnessing is the commodification of compassion,” she explained.

“They’ve turned caring into a career, but it’s all style with no substance.”

As the debate surrounding the couple’s role in American public life reignites, many are echoing Kelly’s sentiments.

Since stepping back from their royal duties, Harry and Meghan have sought to redefine themselves as activists and media figures, yet their efforts often face skepticism regarding their authenticity.

The fire station visit, despite its noble facade, has become yet another episode in the ongoing saga of the Sussexes’ struggle to establish themselves in the public eye.

Kelly’s remarks have resonated with many Americans fatigued by what she labels “celebrity activism theater.”

If Harry and Meghan genuinely wish to help, she argues, they should do so without the cameras and press releases.

“They’re not interested in actual change; they’re more focused on being seen as agents of change,” she asserted, highlighting the disparity between their intentions and actions.

The couple’s visit to the fire sites, which included interactions with first responders and victims, initially presented as a sincere gesture, has been scrutinized under Kelly’s lens.

“Let’s call it what it is,” she quipped, “this isn’t about aiding wildfire victims; it’s about bolstering Harry and Meghan’s public image.”

While some viewers have applauded Kelly for shining a light on what they perceive as hypocrisy, others argue she may be too harsh, claiming that any assistance, regardless of presentation, is better than none.

Nonetheless, Kelly remains steadfast in her critique, insisting that help should be genuine and meaningful, not merely a means to garner attention.

Harry and Meghan have yet to respond to Kelly’s comments, but given their history of addressing critics, it seems inevitable that they will eventually weigh in.

As the conversation about celebrity activism continues to unfold, it’s clear that Meghan Kelly is not backing down.

With each public appearance, Harry and Meghan can expect to face scrutiny from Kelly and others who question their motives.

The LA fire station tour may have backfired for the Sussexes, but it has undoubtedly provided a platform for Kelly to voice her unfiltered opinions.

Whether this latest controversy will affect Harry and Meghan’s public image remains uncertain, but one thing is for sure: as long as they remain in the spotlight, Kelly will be there, ready to challenge their narrative.