In the ongoing saga of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, the couple finds themselves once again at the center of a media storm, primarily fueled by outspoken critics like Meghan Kelly.

The former Fox News anchor has taken a firm stance against the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, accusing them of evading responsibility for their actions and perpetuating a victim narrative.

Kelly’s commentary raises eyebrows, as it often strays into the territory of sensationalism rather than constructive criticism.

Kelly’s critiques of Meghan Markle are particularly pointed.

She claims that the Duchess has exhibited bullying behavior, citing instances where she allegedly made staff members cry, including Princess Kate.

However, this portrayal is complicated by Harry’s own memoir, where he reveals that it was actually Meghan who commented on Kate’s mental state after childbirth, calling her “baby brain.”

Such revelations complicate the narrative, suggesting that the story is not as black and white as Kelly would have her audience believe.

Moreover, Kelly paints Meghan as spoiled, referencing a reported incident involving a tiara that Meghan desired but could not obtain.

According to Kelly, Harry’s defense of Meghan—asserting that “what Meghan wants, Meghan gets”—led to a reprimand from the Queen.

This kind of storytelling can easily alienate public sentiment, making people question the couple’s character and motivations.

Adding fuel to the fire, Kelly argues that Meghan’s estrangement from her family reflects a disloyalty that further tarnishes her image.

Critics of Meghan often highlight this aspect of her life, claiming that her rise to fame came at the cost of abandoning those who supported her.

Such narratives can paint a picture of betrayal, which resonates negatively with audiences eager for a traditional sense of familial loyalty.

Then there’s the couple’s ongoing feud with the press.

While the lawsuits against tabloids grab headlines, it’s the couple’s public lamentations about their treatment that seem to irritate critics.

Kelly emphasizes that other celebrities, like George Clooney and Tom Cruise, face similar scrutiny without resorting to complaints in their public appearances.

This comparison suggests that Harry and Meghan’s approach may be perceived as overly sensitive.

The public’s reaction to Kelly’s remarks has been swift and harsh.

Social media platforms erupted with backlash, with users labeling her comments as bullying and indicative of deeper issues within media discourse.

Hashtags like #Karan emerged, illustrating the collective disapproval of her approach.

Many argue that Kelly’s critiques lack substance and are rooted in personal biases rather than factual analysis.

Critics have also pointed out that Kelly’s commentary often seems more about her insecurities than about holding Harry and Meghan accountable.

By positioning herself as a moral authority, she risks projecting her own issues onto the couple, creating a narrative that lacks genuine understanding or empathy.

This tactic, while attention-grabbing, does little to foster meaningful dialogue.

The racial undertones of Kelly’s criticisms cannot be overlooked.

Some commentators suggest that her vitriol stems from a place of discomfort with Meghan’s success as a biracial woman in a prominent position.

This observation highlights a troubling pattern in media representation, where the achievements of black women are frequently undermined by those in power.

As Kelly continues to criticize Harry and Meghan, many see her actions as an attempt to maintain relevance in a media landscape that thrives on controversy.

Her relentless focus on the couple raises questions about her motivations and the ethics of her commentary.

Is she genuinely concerned about the couple’s impact on the royal family, or is she simply chasing the spotlight?

This dynamic reveals a broader societal issue where accomplished individuals, particularly women of color, face disproportionate scrutiny.

Meghan’s experience is emblematic of the challenges faced by those who break barriers and challenge traditional norms.

The ongoing debate surrounding her and Harry underscores the need for a more equitable media landscape that respects diverse narratives.

Despite the noise surrounding them, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle seem to remain focused on their priorities: their children and philanthropic efforts.

They appear to have adopted a strategy of ignoring the trolls, choosing instead to channel their energy into positive endeavors.

This approach reflects a commitment to their values, even in the face of relentless criticism.

As the discourse around Meghan and Harry continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the complexities of public perception, race, and media dynamics.

The conversations sparked by Kelly’s commentary highlight the need for a more nuanced understanding of these issues, encouraging society to reflect on how we discuss and represent individuals in the public eye.