In his new role as Chief Impact Officer at mental health services business BetterUp, Prince Harry has issued a plea to the public to strive for self-improvement.

However, the Duke has been branded resentful and bitter by a royal expert.

Angela Levin, who has written a biography about Harry, took to Twitter to criticize his comments, stating that he comes across as bitter rather than the charismatic and fun-loving person he used to be.

She also suggested that Harry is isolated and manipulated by his wife, Meghan Markle, and expressed her disappointment in the way Meghan treats the Queen.

Levin has been vocal about her opinions on Prince Harry in recent weeks, particularly after his interview with Oprah Winfrey.

She questioned the accuracy of the claims made by Harry and Meghan and accused them of being self-obsessed for discussing private family matters publicly.

On the other hand, celebrity agent Jonathan Shalit believes that Harry is trying to establish his own identity separate from Meghan’s.

He suggests that Harry wants to keep up with his wife’s success and relevance by taking on new roles in Silicon Valley.

However, the use of Princess Diana’s name by the couple has drawn criticism.

Observers argue that Meghan and Harry are exploiting Diana’s iconic status for financial gain, which goes against how Diana lived her life.

Unlike Meghan and Harry, Diana supported causes close to her heart without seeking monetary benefits.

She also maintained respect for the Queen and the royal institution, considering her eldest son’s future role as king.

The couple’s approach to using Diana’s name has been seen as disrespectful and opportunistic.

Financial expert Phil Dampier also weighed in on the situation, accusing Harry of constantly invoking Diana’s name to promote their charity work and generate income.

Dampier highlighted that Harry spent his inheritance from Diana within a year and now relies on deals like the one with Netflix to support his family.

He criticized Meghan for not playing the long game with the royal family and instead approaching them with what she believed were superior ideas.

Dampier also pointed out that under the American Constitution, American citizens are not allowed to use titles given by foreign powers, but Meghan disregards this for her own financial gain.

The controversy surrounding Meghan and Harry has led to polarizing opinions.

Some experts argue that Meghan is manipulative and attention-seeking, while others believe she is clever and impressive.

The couple’s behavior has been seen as destructive to their own reputation and that of the royal family.

Critics accuse them of being greedy and hypocritical, using their worldwide fame for personal gain.

The fallout from their Oprah interview has only intensified the negative sentiment towards them.

The Palace is reportedly monitoring Prince Harry’s new roles closely to ensure he does not exploit his royal status, as agreed upon with the Queen.

The debate centers around whether Harry’s association with BetterUp and the use of his royal title in promotional materials constitutes trading off the royal brand.

Palace officials are keenly observing the situation to determine if any violations occur.

As opinions continue to divide, it remains to be seen how Meghan and Harry’s actions will impact their public image and future endeavors.

What are your thoughts on this matter?

Share your views in the comment section below and let’s discuss.