Former royal reporter Ahmed Scobie has stirred up a discussion by commending Prince Harry as a commendable leader, following his endorsement of a peculiar tweet.

Widely known as Meghan’s spokesperson, the 42-year-old faced backlash on social media for sharing a clip from Prince Harry and Meghan’s Netflix documentary series.

In the video, Prince Harry reflects on his role as a father of two, emphasizing his achievements while introducing himself to the audience.

However, it was the caption accompanying the post that triggered a reaction from Ahmed’s followers.

The caption read, “Did someone mention good kingery?”

This led to contrasting opinions among users, with some questioning his financial endeavors, alleging he profits from his family.

Despite the criticism, there were supporters of Prince Harry who lauded him for his demeanor.

One admirer described him as “photogenic,” while another expressed admiration, stating, “What a kind-hearted man.

His sincerity and drive to make a positive impact are evident.

Some hearts are just incapable of loving like his.”

Ahmed, a former royal correspondent for Us Weekly and royal editor-at-large at Harper’s Bazaar, gained prominence after establishing a connection with Meghan Markle in 2015.

Their close bond prompted Meghan to seek his assistance in 2018 when she faced online threats.

Ahmed went on to pen two bestselling books about the couple, “Finding Freedom” in 2020 and “Endgame,” despite facing significant controversy.

Despite his intimate knowledge of the Sussexes, Ahmed vehemently denies being friends with them.

He clarified on social media that his insights into the couple are derived from mutual acquaintances rather than personal relationships.

Notably, Ahmed was among the select journalists invited to Meghan’s final solo appearance as a senior working royal, where they shared a heartfelt farewell embrace at Buckingham Palace.

In an interview with Tatler, Ahmed revealed that his presence at significant events had drawn the ire of Prince William, who allegedly believed Ahmed was acting as an intermediary for Prince Harry.

This situation resulted in Ahmed feeling sidelined from royal engagements, affecting his ability to work effectively.

The dynamics between Ahmed, the royal family, and his reporting activities have sparked intrigue and speculation among royal enthusiasts.

The intricate web of relationships and the influence of media figures on royal narratives continue to captivate audiences worldwide.

As the public remains divided on Prince Harry’s actions and Ahmed’s involvement, the evolving saga of the royal family unfolds with each new revelation.