Amelia Wickstead, the renowned London-based fashion designer, is known for her elegant and feminine dresses, often in soft pastel shades.
While not all of her designs are modest, she has become a favorite of Catherine, the Princess of Wales, and has even had the honor of having her creations worn by Meghan Markle.
However, in the past, Wickstead made some controversial comments regarding Meghan’s wedding dress and overall appearance.
Despite being speculated as a potential designer for the royal wedding dress, Wickstead lost out to Clare Waight Keller and the House of Givenchy, who created Meghan’s minimalist gown with a boat neck and three-quarter sleeves.
This decision seemed to have left Wickstead feeling a bit salty.
She reportedly claimed that Meghan’s dress was identical to one of her own designs, stating, “Apparently, a lot of commenters were saying, it’s an Amelia Wickstead dress.”
Wickstead didn’t stop at critiquing the dress itself; she also commented on Meghan’s overall look on her wedding day.
According to Wickstead, if you choose a simple design, the fit should be flawless.
She expressed disappointment in the loose fit of Meghan’s wedding dress and even criticized the hairstyling, exclaiming, “I was like, hold the wisps of her hair back, it’s a royal wedding for God’s sake.”
However, Wickstead later retracted her comments and issued an official statement on Instagram.
In her statement, she expressed sadness over the commentary that had appeared in the press and online, clarifying that she believed Meghan looked absolutely beautiful on her wedding day.
Wickstead also emphasized that she did not think Meghan’s wedding dress was a copy of any of her own designs.
Amelia Wickstead wasn’t the only one to criticize Meghan’s wedding dress.
Pop star Katy Perry also had something to say about it at the time.
Perry suggested that Meghan needed an additional fitting, playfully winking at the camera as she offered her opinion.
Many royal watchers joined in the criticism, describing Meghan’s wedding dress as plain, boring, and ill-fitting.
Some online comments deemed it too simple and not regal enough.
The criticism came swiftly and abundantly.
Interestingly, Meghan’s choice of a pure white gown came as a surprise to the late Queen.
Royal expert Katie Nicholl reveals in her book, “The New Royals,” that the Queen had reservations about the pure white color, expecting Meghan, as a divorcee, to opt for an off-white gown like Camilla did when she married Charles.
The Queen believed that traditionally, a white dress symbolized a woman’s purity and virginity on her wedding day.
According to a royal insider, Meghan enjoyed certain perks from designer brands, even during her time as a member of the royal family.
Tina Brown’s book, “The Palace Papers: Inside the House of Windsor, The Truth and the Turmoil,” explains how Meghan used her now-defunct blog, The Tig, to receive luxury goods for free.
Marketers of luxury brands saw her as someone genuinely interested in receiving their products.
However, due to their royal status, there were deals that Meghan and Prince Harry had to decline.
In conclusion, Amelia Wickstead’s initial critique of Meghan Markle’s wedding dress and appearance caused quite a stir.
However, she later retracted her comments and clarified her admiration for Meghan’s beauty on her special day.
The criticism surrounding Meghan’s dress and the surprise it brought to the late Queen’s expectations added further intrigue to the already captivating royal wedding saga.
Additionally, insights into Meghan’s ability to acquire free luxury items through her blog shed light on the dynamics of her life as both a celebrity and a member of the royal family.