A petition has been launched urging the Living Legends of Aviation to reconsider their decision to include Prince Harry’s name on their roster.
The petition has gained significant attention, with 2,642 people already participating and a goal of securing 5,000 signatures.
The organizers are calling on individuals to endorse the petition and help rectify the situation.
The identity of the person behind the petition might surprise you.
Contrary to expectations, it is not an ordinary individual like myself.
This person has ties to aviation legends such as Orville and Wilbur Wright, Amelia Earhart, and Neil Armstrong.
The plea to remove Prince Harry’s inclusion has struck a chord with many who believe that his nomination is undeserved.
Prince Harry, Duke of Dufus, has been nominated for an award by the Living Legends of Aviation, claiming that he served as a pilot in combat missions in Afghanistan, saving the lives of Allied forces and civilians.
However, upon investigation, it was found that Prince Harry never obtained a pilot license.
The most substantial evidence of his flying experience is that he passed a helicopter test.
Whether this qualifies him to operate a helicopter remains uncertain.
The report raises questions about the accuracy of the nomination and highlights that Prince Harry has never been a licensed pilot.
This viewpoint is supported by members of his platoon and his commander, who assert that he was not engaged in combat flying.
It is unlikely that Prince Harry would engage in actions detrimental to his family if he possessed exceptional skills and accomplishments.
It is disheartening that a reputable organization like the Living Legends of Aviation would overlook genuine heroes who risk their lives daily in service to their countries.
Awards should be bestowed based on merit and genuine accomplishments, rather than status or title.
The assertion that Prince Harry is essentially purchasing this title without the need for merit or skill is concerning.
The petition also emphasizes the importance of accurate representation and the significance of recognition for those who genuinely deserve it.
It is crucial to uphold the principle that awards should be earned through merit, not false credentials.
The relative of Neil Armstrong makes a heartfelt appeal, urging individuals to sign the petition if they believe in accurately acknowledging true valor.
This decision by the Living Legends of Aviation comes at a time when Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are facing a surge of negative public relations.
While the award was intended to be positive PR, Meghan Markle’s public image is steadily declining.
More individuals, including some who identify themselves as relatives, are becoming increasingly critical of their actions.
According to a report, 2023 was a tumultuous year for Meghan and Harry, and 2024 is anticipated to be even more challenging for them.
The Duke and Duchess of Dufus find themselves at a significant low point, facing various setbacks.
Their approach to failure seems to be sinking them further into desperation, rather than learning from their mistakes and rectifying their course.
Opinions vary on how King Charles handled the situation with Meghan and Harry’s departure from the royal family.
While some agree with certain decisions, such as having them vacate Frogmore Cottage, there are aspects where disagreement arises, such as granting titles to invisible surrogate children.
King Charles has received praise for his management of the situation, particularly from Americans who support the monarchy.
However, opinions on this matter are diverse, and not everyone agrees with the assertion that he handled it well.
In conclusion, the appeal to remove Prince Harry’s name from the Aviation Living Legend roster has gained significant attention.
The petition highlights the importance of recognizing genuine heroes based on their actual deeds rather than their titles or perceived actions.
It also sheds light on the challenges faced by Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, who seem to be struggling to navigate through setbacks.
The handling of their departure by King Charles has received mixed reviews, with some praising his approach and others finding fault with certain decisions.